Saturday, February 18, 2017

Coloring Outside the Lines






This is my entry in the Sidney Poitier Blogathon hosted by The Wonderful World of Cinema.




In the old days of the racist South, a black man had to abide by certain rules of etiquette when dealing with white people.  There was segregation that  reared it's ugly head in the form of substandard facilities, like restrooms and restaurants.  There were places where only whites were served.  Black people had to live in segregated neighborhoods, and since they were not paid anything near equal in wages, those neighborhoods were also substandard.

When John Ball appeared on the scene with his first novel featuring Virgil Tibbs, he set the story in this world.  Tibbs himself was, probably (although it's not entirely clear), a former resident of this world.  (He was on his way back home from visiting his mother, and I highly doubt she moved to this world from a more lenient section of the country).  Tibbs, being from Pasadena, CA (in the movie it was changed to Philidelphia, PA), has grown accustomed to being treated more equally, and the change in attitude from the locals leaves him frustrated and edgy.

Sidney Poitier was cast in the iconic role of a northern police officer caught in the South with a murder in which he is first a suspect, then is instrumental in solving the true identity of the murderer.  In the course of the film, Poitier exudes the right amount of a blend of hostility, compassion and superiority, without overdoing any of them.  Since his debut about 20 years earlier, Poitier had been nominated twice for Oscars, winning once for Lilies of the Field.  He brought to the production and astounding resume already at this point in his career, and SHOULD have been able to add a third Oscar nomination for his performance here, but that would prove not to be so.  (He was nominated for a BAFTA and a Golden Globe, so it's not all bad, but still...)






In the Heat of the Night (1967)

It is a hot summer's eve in Sparta, Mississippi.  (Note:  There is no connection to the real Sparta, MS.  The film was not even made in the south, as obviously at that time there would have been extreme hostility to the film's concept in that part of the country.  It was filmed in a "Sparta", but the one in Illinois, instead.)  Officer Sam Wood (Warren Oates) makes his rounds, which includes a brief episode where he indulges in voyeurism, spying on a young girl as she parades around her kitchen in the nude.




Wood eventually discovers a dead body, which is revealed to be that of Philip Colbert, a wealthy man who had been in town to negotiate building a factory, which would have brought much need money and prestige to the community.  Chief Bill Gillespie (Rod Steiger) sends Sam out to find and round up any suspicious persons.  Checking the train station, Wood finds a man in the "colored" waiting room and arrests him.  It turns out, however, that the man is above suspicion: he's actually a police officer on the force in Philadelphia, PA, Virgil Tibbs (Sidney Poitier).



Once it becomes clear that Tibbs is not a valid suspect, the focus is on finding the killer.  Tibbs is basically commanded by his superior officer in Philly to present himself as a help to solve the murder.  Gillespie and the rest of the town are reluctant to even admit that a black man could be of any use, but Gillespie lets Tibbs inspect the body of Colbert.  Tibbs garners some information from his inspections and heads back to the police station.




Enter Harvey Oberst (Scott Wilson), a poor white from the town who has been found with Colbert's wallet and a large sum of money.   Tibbs tells Gillespie that it is highly unlikely that Oberst killed the victim because Oberst is left-handed, and Tibbs' investigations prove that the killer was right-handed.  But since Gillespie's prejudices restrain him from accepting Tibbs' theories, he has Oberst jailed on the murder charge.



Colbert's wife (Lee Grant) is instrumental in the continuation of keeping Tibbs on as a helper in the investigation, threatening to pack up and move the potential factory somewhere else if he is not given a free hand in the investigation.  But she is the only person in town, initially, who is on his side.  Because Tibbs refuses to kowtow and be the subservient Negro that the white people expect of their dark-skinned neighbors, he manages to offend just about everyone with whom he comes into contact.  This is especially true of a gang of roughs who at one point chase him and corner him in an abandoned factory.  It is only the fortunate arrival of Gillespie that prevents him from getting the snot beat out of him.




Tibbs main suspect is the town's rich man, Eric Endicott (Larry Gates), with whom he gets into a slapping match. The so-called "slap heard round the world" comes in a confrontation during an interview with Endicott on his plantation.



 In the course of the film, Delores appears before Gillespie and accuse Woods of having seduced her and gotten her pregnant.  This coupled with the fact that woods recently made a large deposit at the bank causes Gillespie to arrest Woods on suspicion of the murder.  But Woods is innocent, since he has been saving money at home and just made the large deposit after it got really big.  But the pregnancy of Purdy leads Tibbs to discover the true culprit of the murder.


Although he does not win he hearts of the entire town (which would put the movie in the realm of fantasy if he did), he does win the admiration and respect of Gillespie and Woods (and probably  several of Woods' fellow officers).




Steiger was nominated for, and won, the Oscar for Best Actor in the film.  He went up against some sound performances by 4 other actors from other movies, but he was NOT challenged by Poitier for his role as Tibbs.  Why, I can't say.  Poitier's performance is definitely Oscar material.  However, looking at the four other candidates that year, I'd be extremely hard pressed as to decide which one I would have left out in order to put Tibbs in their spot.  Perhaps you might have a choice, so I'll include the other four candidates and see if you can choose:

Warren Beatty in Bonnie and Clyde
Dustin Hoffman in The Graduate
Paul Newman in Cool Hand Luke
Spencer Tracy in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner


The film also won the Oscar for Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Sound Mixing and for Best Film Editing, and was in the running for several other categories.  1967 was a landmark year in the film industry, and for an excellent overview on the background to the five nominees for Best Picture this year (along with this one, also were in the running: Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?, The Graduate, Bonnie and Clyde and Dr. Doolittle), I refer you to Mark Harris' Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of New Hollywood.

Well folks, time to rev up the old Plymouth and head home.  Drive safely.

Quiggy















14 comments:

  1. The involving script captures a time and place that is unfamiliar to many of us and that historical aspect adds to the pleasure of watching the movie.

    I can see where the uniformly interesting performances would cause a problem for those award-givers. It is my observation of the Academy that Steiger's bravado would appeal to the Academy over Poitier's subtlety. We know how "they" work by this time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Growing up in the south in the 60's, I saw the hostility on TV more than I saw it on the streets. But I was raised in a very small town which, in retrospect, I realize had no blacks at all. But I was raised to respect everyone regardless of color, so I probably shut out any thing that didn't fit in with my upbringing. I found out only years later that the town actually discouraged blacks from moving in, but i didn't see it. I know my father sold gas and groceries to whomever showed up to buy, that's all I knew.

      Delete
  2. This sounds riveting! Will definitely have to see this one. It seems amazing now, how a slap could be so momentous and how that was something not seen on film before!

    The book by Mark Harris also sounds fascinating. I confess I have not seen many films from the 1960s, but 1967 looks like a remarkable year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm shocked...shocked that you haven't seen it already...:-) Thanks for reading. Hope you find the book. Try your library. That's where I found the copy i read.

      Delete
  3. Thoughtful review with a brilliant introduction. I remember this is the first Sidney Poitier's film I saw! And I agree, he should have been Oscar nominated for this performance. Thanks again for your participation to the blogathon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have a great love of films were a black man refuses to accept the role he is given by the prevailing southern mentality of the racist whites in the pre Civil rights era. "A Soldier's Story" is another good one. Thanks for reading and letting me join.

      Delete
  4. "The slap hear 'round the world", is maybe how some folks thought of it? This is a terrific, gritty film with lots of tension. Your review definitely did it justice!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was the title of one of the special features on my DVD. Thanks for reading.

      Delete
  5. Very good review of a very good movie. It's definetely one of the best that deals with racism. I liked your pot very much.
    Cheers!
    Le

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. It is a great movie and I enjoyed the chance to cover it.

      Delete
  6. I need to see this again -- it's been many years, but I found it such a compelling movie. Both Steiger and Poirtier were in top form, and the whole thing has a sweaty, claustrophobic feel that is almost palpable. Good review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like the theme of one man fighting the good fight despite the odds. Thanks for reading.

      Delete
  7. One of the best movies ever. Have not seen it in quite a while.
    Steiger, Poitier, Lee Grant et al - amazing acting, compelling script and searing social commentary - and STILL relevant today (unfortunately!)
    -Chris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are some movies worth watching for their content, and their are some worth watching because of the performance of the cast. This one fills both requirements. Thanks, Chris.

      Delete

I'm pretty liberal about freedom of speech, but if you try to use this blog to sell something it will be deleted.