Cross-ed Knives

To start- a reminiscence:

When I was about 13, being a voracious reader, I got a copy of Dave Wilkerson's The Cross and the Switchblade from the library.  The story was about a preacher who started a ministry in the ghetto of New York City to reach out to drug addicts and gang members.  As I was reading I came across an unfamiliar word.  My mother was cooking supper and so I just asked her :

 "Mama, what's a whore?"

My mother's response was probably the same as it would have been if you were to ask your mother the same question at age 13.

"What are you READING??!!" 

(I'm pretty sure she didn't answer my question... even after I told her what I was reading...)

So, back in the 70's, Hollywood's opinion of Christian themed movies was that it was basically kryptonite at the box office.  "You can't make a Christian themed movie! No one will come see it!".  And to be honest, that was a good call, since the movie didn't even break even.  

Pat Boone, the star, called The Cross and the Switchblade his favorite movie he was in, but that he was paid so little that it was almost charity work. But he believed in the message. Boone, a devout Christian, is quoted as saying the film received positive reviews from both reviewers and the movie going public.  (That "movie going public" was probably mostly comprised of Christians who were already receptive to the message, be that as it may).

Along with Boone, the film is also noted as the first feature role for Erik Estrada, who went on to do, among other things, the role of Ponch in the TV series CHiPs.  The rest of the cast was not as prolific in film as Estrada, however.  For a few of them, IMDb only lists this one in their bios. Considering the caliber of acting throughout, that's not too surprising.

But, to be honest I don't think The Cross and the Switchblade was ever meant to be anything but  an evangelical film. "Evangelical films" by nature, are more about the message than the actual acting. Even with name stars in the lead roles of these kinds of films, sometimes the acting comes off a bit cringy. (Sorry, Kirk Cameron fans, but most of his Christian movies put me to sleep.) 

With the exception of the aforementioned Estrada, none of these people ever had any real impact in film. A read of the cast credits will cause most people to say "Who???". Most of them only had about 10 credits at the most when I checked IMDb.  And many times it's pretty obvious why they didn't have resounding careers. The majority of them would probably have been lucky to have a walk-on role in one of the lowest budget blaxploitation or cheapie drive-in flicks.

With 43 credits, Pat Boone pretty much topped them all. But Boone was probably the worst of the bunch. I never really felt he exhibited enough emotion to be a credible street preacher. 

On the other hand, the stand out role was done by Erik Estrada as Nicky Cruz. His transformation from the street tough to a guy who embraces the message the preacher is giving may have been just a tad too predictable, but as the pre-Christian gang member he exhibited a good range of emotion, and it was easy to see how he became a Hollywood star.

One little side tidbit that, of course, I HAVE to bring to the plate (of course I do, dear regular readers, if you've been reading this blog long)  is the fact that one name appears on IMDb as being an "uncredited" cast member: Harry Reems. To those unacquainted with the seamier side of the industry, Harry Reems made a career out of being a porn star.  (And, no, I've never actually seen any of his movies.. but I know his name. He had roles in Deep Throat and The Devil in Miss Jones, both of which you may have heard of, even if you avoided watching them).

 

 

The Cross and the Switchblade (1970): 

In the opening scene we have one solitary guy, who must've taken a wrong turn at the Brooklyn Bridge, surrounded by a bunch of enemies, and he runs from them.  But he is not successful, and the gang catches up to him and beats the crap out of (maybe even kills him?)  

Cut from there to a court scene where those gang members are on trial. And here is where one of the unintentionally (I hope) funny scenes occurs. There is chaos in the courtroom that no judge I know would have ever allowed. During the proceedings an argument takes place between the prosecuting lawyer and the defense lawyer, and the defense lawyer. I can't possibly put down in writing it out how ridiculous this scene is. Suffice to say the prosecuting lawyer claims that the defense lawyer is an idiot and the defense lawyer demands police protection.

Fortunately the whole movie isn't quite as ridiculous as this scene. Although the ridiculousness isn't quite over.  At this point Wilkerson (Pat Boone) walks into the courtroom, but is ejected because the judge thinks he may have a gun (hidden inside that Bible...? Really....?) The police let him go, however, on the promise that he won't try to enter the judge's courtroom ever again.

The next scene shows Wilkerson sleeping in his car (a rickety looking old 50's model that somehow looks out of place even though in reality it is probably only about 15 years old. A gang of pre-teens proceed to strip his car of it's hubcaps (OK) and also his front hood (and I don't get that part, but then I wasn't a gang member in the 60's..)

When Wilkerson wakes up, one kid pulls a knife on him, but exhibiting some moves he probably learned watching a Bruce Lee movie, Wilkerson gets him in an arm lock. Enter big sister, who manages to convince Wilkerson she wasn't in on the whole thing.  

When she realizes that Wilkerson is the same guy who created a hubbub in the courtroom, she introduces herself as Little Bo Peep and  the kid is her brother, Bottle Cap. (Sometimes this movie made me laugh out loud at what they expected you to believe. I mean, really! Little Bo Peep? Bottle Cap?).

Wilkerson goes immediately into preacher mode and Bo listens with a bemused look.  Wilkerson tells her about how his church sent him from rural Pennsylvania to the Big Apple to reach out to the gang members and junkies in the ghetto. He also proves his true Christian nature by giving Bottle Cap his shoes, leaving him to walk around for the rest of the first quarter of the movie in his socks. (Personally, I wouldn't want to walk around that neighborhood even if I had shoes.)

Wilkerson, of course, is confident in his mission because, after all, he is on "a mission from God" (albeit without a dark suit, hat and sunglasses).  He arranges with Bo to take him where one of the really tough gangs congregate, the Mau Maus. They are currently in conference with members of a rival gang, the Bishops.  But to get there they have to go through a neighborhood that is under the control of the AAAGP: "The American Association for the Advancement of Gangsters and Pot" (I swear I'm not making any of this up...)

Wilkerson tries to proselytize to both, but neither are really all that receptive.  After all, they have bigger fish to fry, like who is going to be the King bee gang in the neighborhood.  The Mau Maus are mostly white and the Bishops are pretty much all black, so it is a racial battle as well as a territorial battle.

Inside the room, we also meet Rosa (Jackie Giroux), who will figure into the story much later.  She is obviously strung out on drugs (later we find she is hooked on heroin). So the meeting occurs with Big Cat(!) and Abdullah representing the Bishops and Israel and Nicky representing the Mau Maus. And we get our first introduction to the second star of the film, Erik Estrada as Nicky. They agree on a time and place to rumble and the allowable weapons (which in 50's and 60's apparently never involved guns). At this point Wilkerson chooses to step up and preach to the gang members.

In an effort to make himself acceptable, he does the cultural thing and high-fives the Bishops, but when he tries the same with the Mau Maus, Nicky slaps his face. Dejected at his lack of success, Wilkerson leaves.  But when he gets back to where he parked the car, like a sign from God (whoops, forgot about this film's message...) there is a church.  He goes in and finds he has some friends in the neighborhood after all because the pastor insists that Wilkerson stay at his house during his tour of duty in the ghetto.

The film cuts back and forth between gang action for the next bit, and I couldn't help but think it was choreographed by the same person who choreographed West Side Story.  Every scene involving chase scenes seems like it was planned for a stage production point of view. Not sure if that was the intention, but it certainly didn't seem spontaneous. The riot scene at the beginning of The Warriors felt more real, and that scene actually WAS choreographed. 

Anyway, among other scenes, Wilkerson manages to rescue Rosa who is dying for another fix. At first Rosa's plan is to slice and dice him because Nicky has an extreme animosity for the preacher. He promises Rosa all the heroin she ants if she'll take Wilkerson out of the picture.

He doesn't help her out with money, instead he takes her back to the pastor's place and all of them work around the clock to get her straight. So you think score one for the street preacher.  But he still has hundreds more, and his big trouble is with the gangs who are more concerned about their territory on earth than their mansion in the kingdom of Heaven.

But Wilkerson has an idea.  A big rally in which hopefully the gang members will attend.  The gangs do attend, but they have other things in mind, like a rumble in a place where the cops won't be so likely to interrupt the party.  But Wilkerson sees through their ruse, and gets two members of each gang to come up and take milk cartons around to pass the congregation for a collection.

(Note: When I saw this the only other time I remember, it was as a kid, probably just before or not long after the reminiscence at the beginning of this blog entry. I vividly remembered even today only one scene, and it was this one. Especially where both gang members give meaningful looks to the donators when they think they didn't put enough in the collection box.)

Initially the gang debate whether to split up the collection first or make it a bonus prize for the winning gang in the upcoming rumble.  But then they come to the idea that's exactly what Wilkerson was expecting, and it would trip him up if they just gave him the collection. Wilkerson apparently was thinking the same thing, given the expression of surprise on his face when the gang comes back and gives him ALL the collection.

Then Wilkerson launches into his sermon, and surprise (not!) several members are profoundly affected by his preaching. (I sincerely hope the real Dave Wilkerson was better at preaching than Pat Boone is at playing Wilkerson preaching. I sure wouldn't have been profoundly affected by that piece.) But he does get Nicky among others on board with God. And that my friends was the point. Nicky Cruz (the real guy, not Estrada) went on to found his own ministry.

 

I only recommend this movie to those among my congregation (followers) who can appreciate the underlying message. (I THINK a few of you are Christian, anyway). But don't go into expecting a real entertaining movie if you are not.  I think Estrada is the only actor in this movie that actually pulls off a decent portrayal.  Most of the rest seem to be clueless how to play their roles convincingly.  Even Giroux as the junkie sometimes bleeds over into the realm of over-acting. Although, she is better than Boone. But give Boone a break, his real forte was doing cheesy white bread covers of Black R & B songs for a white audience in the 50's, and not acting.

 Well, folks, the Plymouth may not be a Ferrari, but I bet it runs better than Wilkerson's old junker.

Drive safely, folks.

Quiggy

 

 

 

Don't Ignore the Warning Signs!

 A Public Service Announcement from the folks at The Midnite Drive-In!

 

 

Do you ever think about the messages that movies can teach us? 

 

 

 

There are dangers out there that should be taken seriously when dealing with day to day life. These warning signs ought to be posted everywhere. The problem is most people don't know about the threats in this world.  So, as a public service The Midnite Drive-In has taken on the role of presenting you with this  announcement.  

Be wary of these threats! It could be YOUR life you save!

 

There's no place like home to start with the warnings:

 

 

 While still in the house, there should be some additional warning signs:

 

 

 

 

But don't bother your family while you are taking precautions ...

 

 And, really...

 

 

 

Maybe its better if, in the first place,  you just...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But, if you leave...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And if you do go out...

 

Sometimes it might be better if you...

 

But seriously, folks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because this is all just a dream....

 

 

Right now you're probably thinking you have a warning for me...

 

Ha! The joke's on you... This IS my day job!

Quiggy

Books On Fire

 

First, I have to admit I never really liked the TV show The Waltons. In the original air time that the series ran, from 1972-1981, I was the odd man out during the evening it aired because both my parents and my sister were big fans.  So most of the time I would go to my room and read while they watched the show. My usual tastes as a kid at that time were science fiction or comedies. 

For a major part of the 70's, our TV watching was a shared venture. One night I would get to pick the shows and another night my sister would get to pick. My sister's choices would usual be family-friendly fare like The Waltons or Little House on the Prairie, or, in some cases, a show which featured the current teen heartthrob. The family fare I never warmed up to, but in retrospect some of those shows with the "cute guy" factor were actually pretty good, if I ignored that part and just watched the show... (Magnum, P.I. comes to mind here).

My shows, on the other hand, usually had either some comedic format or some science fiction theme. As far as comedies, I usually liked All in the Family, The Jeffersons, Sanford and Son or Chico and the Man. On the science fiction side I usually had less success because sci-fi TV was a wasteland of missed opportunities. Usually these shows would barely last one season and I would have to wait in anticipation for the next batch of attempts. Some of the 70's science fiction shows that failed to find a niche were Planet of the Apes, Logan's Run and Project U.F.O. 

On one (rare) occasion when I actually sat and watched an episode of The Waltons I actually saw an episode that molded and affected my outlook on life and vitally changed my perspective, I think for the better. In season 5 of the series, the season began with John-Boy Walton (Richard Thomas) starting up his own newspaper. 

 

The Waltons  Season 5 Episode 5 The Fire Storm (original air date Oct. 21, 1976):

 (Note: There is a subplot in this episode involving Erin Walton (Mary Elizabeth McDonough) wanting to enter a local beauty pageant and receiving a lot of negative pressure from the family.  While this part of the episode is not inferior, I won't delve too much into it, except where it intrudes on the main part of the story, on which I am focusing.)

Well into this season, John-Boy has struggled to keep his paper informative.  He has higher aspirations than just a community paper that only covers the local weather and community events.  As such he has notified the community of his intentions to reprint parts of Adolph Hitler's Mein Kampf. The local community, as well as the whole world, have been observing the things going on in Germany at this time, including the notorious book burnings. There is considerable pressure  on John-Boy not to follow through with his plans.

In an early scene, the town preacher, Rev. Fordwick (John Ritter) uses his pulpit as a political podium to try to convince John-Boy to see the error of his ways. 

 

And, although John-Boy does have the support of his father, John (Ralph Waite), it is clear that even his family has some misgivings.  Especially after some one throws a rock through the Walton family window, with a crudely drawn swastika on it. 

One by one, the advertisers and potential sales outlets of his paper withdraw their support, clearly trying to intimidate John-Boy to give up his quest.  But John-Boy clearly is strong in his conviction that he is doing what is right.  His goal is to make people aware of the situation going on in Germany. (Note: As indicated in the prologue, this episode takes place in 1937, still a couple of years away from the start of WWII.  Hitler is getting noticed, but he has yet to become an actual threat on the international scene, as yet.)

That conviction leads John-Boy to publish his article, despite the animosity for his determination. Even his sister turns against him. Erin had entered that beauty contest, but lost, and she blames John-Boy. She thinks that her loss in the contest is directly due to the ill feelings that John-Boy has stirred up, which are now being directed, by her thinking, to other family members.

The celebration that pageant was in conjunction with ends with Rev. Fordwick  trying to politicize the situation again.  Maybe Fordwick has his intentions in the right place, but in comparing him to the rest of the community, he is just as close-minded as the rest of the town.  He proposes that the community respond by symbolically burning a copy of Mein Kampf. 

One of the other citizens dumps a bag of books near the fire and proposes burning them, too. Simply because they are written in German. And, since most of those people in the crowd don't know Kacke (poop) from Kuchhen (cake), they are enthusiastic about the idea.

John-Boy has had enough.  He steps up and delivers the speech with which I so identify:

"This is my fault! I started this whole thing with my newspaper, I know that. But you misunderstood me! I was trying to show you what people are capable of.  Out of ignorance! Out of fear! Out of hatred! Do you realize that this kind of thing is happening all over Germany? All over Germany!  And right now Germany and Walton's Mountain are not very far apart in my mind. I read that a foreign tyrant was publishing his plans to take over the world and carrying out those plans. I thought you ought to have the opportunity to know about it, just like I'd take the opportunity to tell you if there was a blight that was threatening your crops or some kind of scandal that was threatening our government. I mean that's freedom as far as I can see it, and if you choose not to know about it, that's freedom, too. But if you take a book and you burn this book, then you CAN'T know about it, and you've had your freedom taken away from you! Do you understand me? And if there's anybody here who feels that this book is more dangerous in one piece than it is burned to ashes in that fire, then I want you to come up here. I want you to take it out of my hand. I want you to throw it in the fire right now! Throw them all into the fire!"

 

The scene ends with John-Boy spying a book in the pile of books about to be burned, and asks one of the ladies to come up and read it in the original German. Mrs. Brimmer (Nora Marlowe), who had earlier revealed that she and her husband had run into problems in other towns because they were German, does so.

"Am Anfang schuf Gott Himmel und Erde. Und die Erde war wüst und leer, und es war finster auf der Tiefe; und der Geist Gottes..."

And then he asks her to translate it and the big reveal comes...

"In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth. And the Earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.  And God said let there be light... "

So the townspeople, who are deeply religious, are shocked that the Holy Bible was almost cast into the fire, simply for being printed in German. A change of heart comes even over Rev. Fordwick, and he hands both the Bible and the copy of Mein Kampf to John-Boy, telling him they need to be in good hands.

 

 

The reason why this episode affects me so deeply is that it was one of the incidents in my life that formed my Libertarian ideals, and one that so fits how I feel about the First Amendment, especially that part about free speech and freedom of the press. Also that tendency by the public at large to be closed minded to ideas that go against what they may have already taken a permanent root in their lives. When I was a kid, the local newspaper had a quote in it's masthead that was attributed to Voltaire: "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." That quote inspires my outlook on life immensely. 

One only has to be told to "shut up" because their viewpoint goes against the prevailing norm to realize that the pressure to fit in can sometimes go against everything you clearly believe. This has sometimes put me in precarious situations over the years.  Not life-threatening, but often relationship-threatening. But I still stand behind my viewpoints, regardless of whether family or friends find my position at odds. And I adamantly will stick to my convictions, regardless of pressure, and for that I thank John-Boy, or more specifically, the author of this episode.

One thing that occurs to me however, is this. Apparently John-Boy printed those excerpts without editorial comment. That in itself might have staved off at least some of the reaction he got for printing them. 

Thanks for your attention.

Quiggy

 

A Time to Die... or Maybe Not

 

 

 

 The future is uncertain... or is it?  What if we could know what the future holds? 

The trope of time travel in science fiction has at least two well-known themes.  One is that of the narrator who actually does the time traveling himself and relates his or her experiences for the audience.  Think  The Time Machine in which the protagonist has journeyed (in this case the future) and returned to let his friends (and us) know what the future holds. 

Another is that in which a mysterious stranger appears on the scene and claims to be from some distant future. In this case, most often anyway, this stranger is considered to be crazy, because, after all, time travel is not really possible, therefore the stranger must be delusional. Think 12 Monkeys as a good example of this theme.

Of course, as we know it now, time travel, at least in terms of the way it is accomplished in the science fiction trope, is impossible. We have the story of John Titor, a man who appeared on the scene in the late 90's, who claimed to be from the future, but whether or not he really was is debatable. Reading the link above will be more instructive, but in essence, his pronunciations of future events were not entirely accurate. He claimed that there would be a civil war in the U.S. in 2015, for example.

Of course, even he himself gave himself an out in case his predictions were proved untrue.  He said that we could change the future by changing whatever actions we took to another track. But did he really come from the future and we created an alternate timeline by our actions or was he just full of so much malarkey?

Time travel theory has so many rabbit holes one could go down.  The classic grandfather paradox, for example. If you could go back in time and somehow accidentally kill your own grandfather before he ever met your grandmother, you obviously would not have been born.  Therefore how could you have gone back in time to commit the act?  Theoretically any action you took on your travel back in time could seriously affect your present.  

But time travel theorists get around that by claiming your actions created an alternate timeline. One in which you actually did commit the act.  But the world you came back to would be altered, maybe for the better, but also maybe for he worst.  Ray Bradbury once wrote an excellent short story in which a character went back to the prehistoric era and accidentally killed a butterfly.  The world he came back to in the present was so seriously altered that it was unrecognizable.

I don't really want to get in to the possibilities of time travel here. I just wanted to prepare you for some musings that will happen in this blog entry as I discuss the story lines of the entries.

To get down to the meat of this entry, in 1984 we were treated to one of the best time travel movies ever made, The Terminator.. The story arc involves more than just the first movie (there have been as of this date 5 movies involving the story arc, of varying degrees of quality).  But the first one, which I saw in the theater, was my favorite. Note: Many lists say Terminator 2 is a better movie. But this is my blog, and therefore my opinion... 

After it came out, an author named Harlan Ellison claimed that the movie was WAY similar to two stories he had written, both of which became episodes of the classic TV series from the 60's, The Outer Limits. He sued. (He was a very litigious man., by all accounts.  He would apparently sue people at the drop of a hat).

The ultimate outcome was that James Cameron had to add a reference to Ellison in the credits when it was released on video.  But was his claim valid?  I wondered.  So I found both episodes and watched them to see how much similarity there was in the movie to his original stories.  Below are the two episodes, followed by a detailed review of the movie.  You can decide for yourself.

The Outer Limits "Soldier" (Broadcast date: Sept. 19, 1964):

In the far distant future two soldiers battle.  They are given instructions through their headsets to kill "The Enemy". They come to a final clash on a barren landscape.  

During the battle they are hit with what appears to be bolts of lightning and sent into a vortex.  One of the soldiers, Qarlo (Michael Ansara) ends up in modern day (1964) United States.

Because he is dressed oddly and because he seems to have a violent demeanor, he is immediately captured and confined to a prison / mental institution.  Since his language is unfamiliar, an expert in languages is brought in to try to figure out who he is and what he is saying. Eventually the expert (Lloyd Nolan) figures out that what he is speaking is a form of English, and that he is from the future.  He tries his best to "civilize" the man, since basically all he knows is his mission: to kill the Enemy.

In the end the expert removes Qarlo from his captivity and brings him into the normal world.

Meanwhile, Qarlo's "Enemy" finally escapes the vortex and finds his own way into the present, and he, too, is programmed to kill the Enemy, in this case Qarlo. The ultimate end is the two battle.  And destroy each other. 

The only real connection between this episode and The Terminator, as far as I can tell, is that the soldiers are from the future.  If that is the only connection, Ellison was full of shit.  I mean there must be dozens of stories about soldiers from the future traveling back in time, some that even predate his story.

 The Outer Limits "Demon with a Glass Hand" (Broadcast date:  Oct. 17, 1964):

In this episode we have yet another soldier. This one, Tent (played by Robert Culp), is one who awakes with no memory of who he was past "10 days ago". He only knows that someone (or some people are trying to kill him, and his only "friend" is a glass hand.  His hand, which has apparently replaced his real hand is only a partial one. It is missing fingers. He can communicate with the hand and asks it questions constantly.

When he asks it, at the beginning, who these people are and what to do, the hand tells him that the only way to defeat his pursuers is to remove a gold medallion that each carries. And that, to stay alive, his destiny is in his "whole hand".  Cryptic to say the least at this point. And staying alive is :easier said than done."

Immediately Trent captures one of the people and interrogates him.  Thus he discovers that his potential assassins are the Kyba and they come from the future. They are after him to get his hand, which supposedly holds all knowledge. And that he, Trent, is the last man on Earth. Well, obviously he is not the "last man" since this is taking place in the present. So maybe Trent isn't actually from the present time.

The captive reveals that the gold medallion is a device that keeps each assassin in the present, and when it is removed, that person actually doesn't die; he just returns to the future.  And Trent also wears a medallion, so Trent also comes from the future.  As the hand explains this to him, it reveals that the Kyba invaded Earth and had plans to annihilate the human race, but inexplicably, the entire human race vanished.

The secret is that the hand does have all the answers, but it can only function when it is entirely complete.  And the Kyben have the three missing appendages.  They in turn want the rest of his hand because, after all, it holds the key to finding those millions of future humans that disappeared. And to help them get to Trent they have put up a force field around the building from which there is no escape.  So he is all alone.

Well, not quite.  He finds a woman, Consuelo (Arlene Martel),  a human from the present in one of the offices.  So now he has an ally (or at the very least a hostage) to help him defeat the Kyba in the building. 

 

But he has to find and destroy the machine, called a "time mirror" that is a gateway for the Kyba to send back more assassins from the future. (Just a thought, though.  If these Kyba can send back soldiers to hunt Trent, and they have sealed off that one building so there is no escape, why couldn't they just send back 100, or even 1000 soldiers and just have done with it?)

The aliens kill Trent and capture him and Consuelo, and attach one of the fingers.  Thinking there is no threat they leave him and Consuelo alone, and go to await aliens who are coming through the time machine with the other two fingers.  Meanwhile the computer in Trent's hand tells Consuelo how to revive him.  You just THOUGHT he was dead.  As he gradually gets more of the missing appendages the computer in his hand becomes more able to help him find out exactly what he is doing here.  Which turns out to be finding a cure for a plague, one of the reasons the aliens need his hand. 

You see, the humans had created a plague that would destroy all life. Then they transcribed the human race into electronic circuits and put themselves on a thin wire.  Which is how they escaped the plague that is killing off the Kyba in the future.  And ultimately, Trent finds out that he is not a man, but a robot, with that wire imbedded in his body.

OK, at least this episode has some elements that are somewhat similar to the film.  But instead of a robot sent back to eliminate the leader of the rebellion, this robot was sent back to keep the strand of human life alive until that future date when the plague will have dissipated. The only question not really answered is why 1000 years in the past.  Why not just a 100 or so. Trent will have to live through not only the 1000 years, but another 200 beyond that before the Earth will be safe for the return of the humans.

And now we have the plagiarizing culprit...

The Terminator (1984):

The story begins in the future. A vast landscape in the middle of an ongoing battle.  In a brief prologue, before the title and credits run, we find out that, circa 2029 (that's only 4 years from this writing...), "the machines rose from the ashes of the nuclear fire. Their war to exterminate mankind has raged for decades, but the final battle would not be fought in the future. It would be fought here, in our present. Tonight..."  With just that brief synopsis to introduce to the concept, and the credits and title we segue to present day.

You probably know the drill already. A terminator, an indestructible android (played by the indestructible Arnold Schwarzenegger), appears in a flash of lightning. Nude. 

If you thought I was going to post the nude Arnie, sorry...

Apparently even androids can't use the time machine with clothes, since a little later a human comes through the same type of time transport and he too is nude.

The human is on the run from the cops from the get go.  He and the terminator are both seeking one Sarah Connor.  The terminator is systematically looking for Sarah, but apparently does not know the exact Sarah it is seeking, since it dispatches two of the three listed in the phone book. Luckily for her, (and us as the viewers of the film), the Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) whom it is seeking are listed third of the three people named "Sarah Connor" in the phone book.

Apparently the human, whose name is Reese (Michael Biehn), knows which one is the real target since he tracks her down without bothering to look for the other two. Meanwhile, back at Sarah's apartment, the terminator busts in and wastes Sarah's roommate and her boyfriend.  Mission accomplished as far as the terminator is concerned... right?

Wrong.  At that moment Sarah, panicked because of the two dead Sarah Connors and believing some nutcase is whacking off anyone named Sarah Connor, calls her roommate and leaves a message on the answering machine.  Now the terminator is not only aware that there is still one Sarah to deal with, and by virtue of Sarah telling the roommate where she is, it has it's next destination.  Meanwhile, at the club where Sarah is hiding, she is staying because a Lt. Traxler (Paul Winfield) has told her to stay put, because after all, she is in a public place and no one is going to try anything in a public place. (Yeah, right.)

Both of the future boys end up at the club where Sarah Connor is and Reese blows away the terminator and tells her "come with me if you want to live". 

While on the run Reese tells Sarah what the situation is. Both he and the terminator are from the future.  He was sent back to protect her from the terminator, which is a cybernetic organism (cyborg) which had been sent back to kill her.  Eventually Reese will tell her why. Her unborn son, John Connor, is the leader of the resistance movement against the machines that are trying to take over in the future.  The machines figure if they can eliminate her before she has the son the resistance will be eliminated.

But not only does Reese have to deal with the terminator, he also has to deal with the present day cops, who eventually capture him and Sarah.  Of course, no one ca really be from the future so Kyle must be mentally deranged.  But the terminator (who probably would be also considered mentally deranged, if they could talk to him) stages a raid on the police headquarters, still trying to complete his mission.  Reese manages to use the chaotic distraction to free himself from his handcuffs and escape with Sarah.

While in hiding Reese tells Sarah a little about the future.  Although it is pretty bleak, there is still some hope, and most of it relies on the  tenacity of their leader, her as yet unborn son.  (I should point out that at this point she isn't even pregnant.  Remember that...)  The two hide out a a motel, and Reese leaves, instructing Sarah to let "no one know" where she is.  But she calls her mom and tells her.  Unfortunately, as you may have guessed, her mom is no longer in the picture.  She just told the terminator who, since he is all machine, has the ability to mimic her voice.

Meanwhile things develop back at the motel and Sarah and Reese develop a relationship that gets a bit intimate.  And thus, guess who the father of John is.  You get three guesses, but the first two don't count... So, ultimately we find out why John picked Reese as the man to go back in time to protect her.  (Ignore that time paradox that just came in to your head or the rest of the movie and the rest of the franchise will have no point.

No nude pictures here, either...

The terminator shows up at the motel and. of course, there is an obligatory car chase. The explosives that Reese rigged up have no affect on the pursuing terminator.  But just when things start to look bleak, Reese sets off a bomb that explodes the gas truck that the terminator was using to chase them and he and it go up in flames.

Movie over?  Yeah, right.  Keep thinking optimistically...

The terminator rises from the ashes.  (And this being before CGI, that skeleton of it's makeup is pretty impressive...)

The terminator follows Reese and Sarah into an automated factory where all that machinery is somewhat distracting to the terminator, but it is relentless. And once again Reese is able to seemingly defeat it.  But that's just an illusion... Reese unfortunately dies, but not that relentless S.O.B. 

Of course, Sarah finally finds that drive she needs and lures the terminator into a hydraulic press. And finally! Success!

OK, so the verdict is... The Terminator does have some parts of it that could be construed as somewhat inspiring of the story, but not much.  And yet, the director, rather than have a long drawn out legal battle, chose to capitulate.  I must admit it hurts some to watch this film and see that tag at the end "Acknowledgement to the works of Harlan Ellison".  If it had been me, being the combative personality that I am, I would have told Ellison "Go ahead.  Make my day." (Another movie that has no relationship to Ellison's work, but I bet if he could have found a sliver of opportunity, he wouldn't have hesitated...).

Note: I like Ellison as an author.  He wrote some fantastic stories.  But if he was as much an a-hole as history has made him out to be, I wouldn't have sat down and had a drink with him.

Well, time to fire up the old Plymouth and see if I can dodge those AI robots and make it home.  Drive safely.

Quiggy