Sunday, May 31, 2026

Semiquincentennial Movie Project #22: To Kill a Mockingbird

 

 

The Semiquincentennial  Movie Project is an ongoing celebration of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. During the course of this project your humble blogger is choosing a movie a week to represent each of the 50 states in the Union, as well as a movie scheduled for 4th of July weekend that will represent the nation's capitol, Washington D.C. The order of the weekly entries will coincide with the order of each state's entry into the fold (although, not necessarily coinciding with the date of their entry into said fold).

 

 


 

Week #22: Alabama -

 

 
The state of Alabama was established on December 14, 1819. 
 

Details about Alabama:

State bird: yellowhammer

State flower: southern long leaf pine

State tree: camellia

Additional historical trivia:

Rosa Parks became one of the icons of the civil rights movement when she refused to move to the back of the bus in Montgomery. 

Although celebrating Mardi Gras is most associated with New Orleans, the first Mardi Gras celebration in the U.S. happened in Mobile in 1703.

In 1836 Alabama became the first state to declare Christmas a holiday.

Without the Saturn V rocket, the moon landing doesn't happen. It was developed in Huntsville.

The oldest baseball stadium that is still in use is located in Birmingham.

Birmingham is the site of one of the most specialized bookstores in the world. The Alabama Booksmith only sells books that have been signed by the authors. (But, no, apparently they do not currently have a copy of the novel that inspired today's movie...)

Famous people born in Alabama: Harper Lee, Rosa Parks, Jim Nabors, Courtney Cox, Hank Williams, Nat King Cole,  Helen Keller, Jesse Owens, Hank Aaron and  Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

 


 

To Kill a Mockingbird (1962): 

The film begins in the quiet town of Maycomb, Alabama. "Scout" Finch (Mary Badham) and her brother, Jem (Phillip Alford), await their father, Atticus (Gregory Peck), to come home. In the meantime they meet a neighbor kid, Charles Baker Harris (John Megna). The three have a great rapport (such innocence as children had, and maybe still have, for all I know).


 

The children teach other little things about the neighbors and townspeople, including some of those rumors that often develop among children, such as the highly "dangerous" neighbor, Boo Radley, whom no one ever sees because he is supposedly chained up in the basement and only comes out at night. And Mrs. Dubose, a crotchety old woman next door, who antagonizes the children with somewhat veiled threats of what they will end up becoming when they grow up. Both of these characters are kind of like the boogeyman for the children, because after all, a part of growing up requires that children have some sort of boogeyman to be afraid of, whether or not such boogeymen really are worthy of that fear. 

In the background (as yet not the foreground) is the local judge coming to Atticus to try to get him to be the defense lawyer for a local black man who has been accused of rape of a white woman. In another world, the real world at the time, in other words, the black man probably would have already been lynched, without a trial. But then if that happened we would have no story.


 

Atticus is a proud man who has conscience and a ideal of doing what is right. As he tells Scout who asks why he is defending Tom:

If I didn’t I couldn’t hold up my head in town, I couldn’t represent this county in the legislature, I couldn’t even tell you or Jem not to do something again.” 


 

Whether or not he initially believes in the innocence of his client at the beginning is not important. What matters is that Atticus is adamant that Tom Robinson (Brock Peters) be given a fair shake and a fair trial, and not just convicted by the prevailing crowd without said trial. There is a lynch mob that shows up midway through the film with that exact intention... This not being a Perry Mason mystery, we don't get a lot of investigation into the facts of the story. What comes out of the truth of the actual story is only played out during the trial.


 

The trial itself seems a little unbelievable. Not the facts that come out, mind you, but the lack of a crowd reaction to Atticus' questions posed to the witnesses. I kept expecting outrage from someone in the crowd, but instead the only reactions come from whomever is on the witness stand at the time. The most difficult part of this is there is no reaction to Atticus' basic accusations: a) that Tom is being railroaded and b) that the victim, Mayella (Collin Wilcox), was more or less the instigator not the victim. I would have expected a riot or at least someone trying to shout down Atticus at this point.


 

Of course, you may or may not know how the trial came out. In an effort to play fair, I will thus say spoiler alert! Tom is convicted of the crime, this despite the fact that Atticus pretty much exposed the whole thing as a lie on the part of Mayella and her father. The upshot is that Tom is carted off to prison, but is supposedly shot while trying to escape. (I will interject an opinion here: While the "escape" and "shooting" may have been accepted as plausible by the 60's audience, the cynic in me says that may not be how it really played out. Yet the film seems to want us to accept the story as told by the sheriff).  

There is still a bit of story left, including a revelation of who the mysterious Boo Radley (Robert Duvall) is. Hint: he is NOT the boogeyman. (And, although he never utters a word, Duvall made enough of an impression in his first film role that his one scene is fairly memorable). 


 

Although the film is primarily about Atticus and his efforts to defend a black man, Tom, in the rape trial, there are also some aspects of it that dwell on the lifestyle of a small town, and the film is sometimes a love letter to a more idyllic time. Sure, the racism aspect stands out in stark contrast against the backdrop, but some of the scenes come off a bit elegiac. Especially early on in the film.  The point of the film, and the novel it was based on, was, of course, to focus on the racial prejudices of the era. 

(A side note: One of my pet peeves is when a book or a movie is banned or criticized for pointing out what was historically accurate. The book, along with The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been targeted in recent years for banning, simply because black people are referred to as "niggers", as they are also in the film. It seems that the current PC crowd want to erase the fact that at one time there was an inequality between the white and black people. While I don't think it was a fair way to treat a fellow man, I also don't believe in trying to censor a part of history just because we are supposed to be more enlightened now).

To Kill a Mockingbird was nominated for 8 Oscars. In a different year it might have won more than the three it did win. It had the misfortune of competing for Best Picture that year with Lawrence of Arabia (the winner), as well as The Longest Day and The Music Man. (Mutiny on the Bounty was also a candidate, but personally I prefer the Clark Gable and the Mel Gibson versions). It also lost Best Director to David Lean for the aforementioned Lawrence of Arabia. Mary Badham was also nominated for Best Supporting Actress but lost to Patty Duke for The Miracle Worker. It did win in the category of Best Actor and Best Adapted Screenplay, both times beating out the Lawrence film.

It was the 6th highest grossing film of the year (although, technically, most of it's ticket sales probably came in 1963. It was released on Christmas Day of 1962). It was a critical success, too.  It currently holds a 93% Fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and among it's advocates was Bosley Crowther who praised the "charming enactments of a father and his children in that close relationship, which can occur at only one brief period"and that that part of it was "worth all the footage of the film". Even in today's age it still gets it's share of praise. 

A couple of things worth pointing out as a wrap-up: The narration of the film is done by Kim Stanley, who in 1982 was nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. James Earl Jones was one of the actors that auditioned for the role that eventually went to Brock Peters. Peters, BTW, had another connection to Jones; while Jones was the voice of Darth Vader in the Star Wars films,  it was Peters who did the voice on the radio versions of the stories. 

It is a worthy film. It ranks #34 on A.F.I.'s 100 Greatest Films.  Check it out if you haven't already seen it. Until next time, drive safely, folks.

Quiggy

 


 

Celebrate the Drive-In Week: Smokey and the Bandit

Celebrate the Drive-In is a tribute to a beloved venue of the past. During it's heyday, a trip to the drive-in was one of my favorite things, both on the rare occasions as a child, and in my early adulthood. This blog is going to celebrate Drive-In Day (Jun 6) with a series of movies that I was too young to see (or in a couple of cases, not even born yet) that I wish I could've experienced in a drive-in. Keep coming back for the entire week as there will be one per day for the duration.

 


Sometimes a movie comes along that just tail grabs you and hangs on for dear life. May I present the next Coming Attraction! Smokey and the Bandit!





 

The trucker and the CB craze of the late 70's gave us quite a number of movies that centered on outlaw truckers using the CB to circumvent that annoying law of 55MPH. I've already covered two of these in a recent post (Convoy and The Great Smokey Roadblock), but there are plenty of others just dying to be included at some point in the future. I won't rehash the CB craze story here. If you are of a mind to check the archives, those two movies I reviewed earlier this year will give you some tantalizing tidbits.  Just to note, there are several I will try to get around to in the coming months, including White Line FeverBreaker! Breaker!, and C. B. Hustlers.

Burt Reynolds was one of my favorite actors in his younger days. One of my fondest drive-in movie experiences was going to see Cannonball Run and Cannonball Run II with a couple of buddies. I also saw Stroker Ace and City Heat there too (although not a a double feature). 

Those are the only ones that I got to see at a drive-in, but there are plenty others that are worth checking out. Deliverance, although not a comedy (which I prefer of Reynolds' output) is a highly entertaining movie. And I have always said, and always will say, that the Reynolds' version of The Longest Yard is head and shoulders (and torso, and legs) better than the Adam Sandler remake. (not to disparage Sandler: there are plenty of his movies that are good... just not that one).

The whole concept of the first Smokey and the Bandit just hinges on road mayhem as Reynolds tries to get from Atlanta to Texarkana and back in 28 hours. Probably not near as a rough bet as it was in 1978, when the speed limit was still 55MPH. You'd still have to cut corners and go over the speed limit to make it now, I bet, but with that 70 or sometimes even 80 MPH speed limit, it would be a lot more manageable. But then again, see below for a small nitpick on the whole "road trip" part of the film...

 

Smokey and the Bandit (1978):

Bo Darville (Burt Reynolds), who is more well known by his C.B. handle, "Bandit", is a legend, and not just in his own mind, although that helps. 


 

As such a "legend", local bigwigs "Big Enos" Burdette (Pat McCormick) and his son "Little Enos" Burdette (Paul Williams) seek him out to face a challenge. As established in the prologue, these two have tried this same challenge on every trucker down the line, as one of them is told when he is arrested. The Burdettes make this challenge with Bandit, counting on his overinflated ego to push him into it.


 

What's the challenge? Why, to go to Texas and pick up a truckload of beer and bring it back to Atlanta. In only 28 hours. (Which the movie leads you to believe is 900 miles there and 900 miles back, but a check of Google maps says it's less than 700. depending on starting point and ending point, of course, but nowhere near that "900 miles"... So unless they were taking the scenic route, they could have made that trip without breaking the speed limit. but then we wouldn't have a movie.)

So why are they traveling to Texas to get beer in the first place? Because, at the time, Coors beer, the beer they are trying to get, was not distributed east of Texas. So, what with the law being what it is, they would be guilty of bootlegging. The movie tends to play fast and loose with the geography and the technicalities. Here, the basic reason, again at that time, that you couldn't go long distances with Coors beer was because, with the process by which it was made, it required refrigeration, unlike most beers which can sit on the dock for days or even weeks,  and still be fine. And apparently adequate refrigeration was not a constant in those days. So technically, it wasn't illegal, just logistically impossible.


 

Anyway, Bandit ropes in his buddy, Cledus (Jerry Reed), who also goes by his C.B. handle, "Snowman" to drive the rig, while Bandit himself will drive a Trans Am to block and be a lookout for the journey. They make it to Texarkana with time to spare, but due to the warehouse being closed, they essentially have to steal the beer. So far, so good on the bet, even if they've had to play fast and loose with the law.


 

On the way out of Texas, Bandit picks up a hitchhiker, Carrie (Sally Field). It seems that Carrie is a runaway bride, who ducked out on the wedding. 


 

Unfortunately, the father of the groom did not take kindly to this... The father, Buford T. Justice (Jackie Gleason), also happens to be the county sheriff and begins a hot pursuit of Bandit. Not because of the illegal cargo, however. His goal is to get Carrie back, and arrest Bandit for violating the Mann Act. And possibly force Carrie to go through the wedding...? Shotgun wedding, anyone...?

 

(Since some may not know what the Mann Act is, it is a law created to try to cut down on prostitution across state lines, but was broadly used to arrest other, less despicable violators, such as a couple who were consensual companions. Even eloping couples could be arrested at one time.)

The main gist of the movie is the pursuit of Bandit, not only by Justice, but also various law officers across the southeastern states they are traveling. Some of those are just trying to apprehend him because he has been doing 90-110 MPH in a speed zone established at 55 MPH. Some others may have their own agenda. But Justice keeps up his own pursuit, even though he is constantly told by the local gendarmes that he is WAY out of his jurisdiction.


 

Along the way Bandit causes several cars to become unable to continue pursuit, but at only 10 cars and 1 motorcycle cop, it hardly compares to the mayhem The Blues Brothers  caused a few years later. And the damage that is caused to Justice's own police car would make it break down on the side of the road if it were any other car... I think it may have been a distant cousin to the Bluesmobile that the aforementioned Blues Brothers drove. And that one was also a cop car, originally, that had been recommissioned for it's final purpose, so maybe Timex had a hand in it's make. (Old commercials for Timex watches always claimed the watch "could take a licking and keep on ticking"...)

 


Don't miss the final scenes of the movie. At one point, late in the movie, Bandit takes advantage of a convoy to hide from one of the pursuing cops. In that convoy are several familiar faces. One is Hank Worden, a frequent character actor in John Wayne films. And another guy, who looks a lot like Mickey Dolenz, but is actually a former defensive tackle for the New York Jets, Joe Klecko. You are bound to see a few more faces in the film, including Alfie Wise, who was a frequent actor in Reynolds movies.

Joe Klecko (not Mickey Dolenz)

 

Hank Worden

 

Alfie Wise

 

With a budget of only $4 million, Smokey and the Bandit cleared $126 million, making it only second to Star Wars in money draw for 1977. It currently has a 77% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Reviews were mostly kind to it, although Gene Siskel, one part of the two-headed monster of Siskel and Ebert, only gave the film 2 out of four stars, citing complaints about Carrie never revealing her jilted groom was Justice's son. (Although her facial expressions state otherwise, she claims to Bandit that she doesn't know why the sheriff is chasing them across state lines, either.)

Nitpicking aside, both on Siskel's part and mine. Smokey and the Bandit is a fun hour and a half ride. Both Reynolds and Gleason had a part in making this movie ring well with viewers. I gather that Gleason did a lot of improvisation throughout the movie, which just shows what a great showman he was.  

The movie also had an effect on the market for the Pontiac Trans Am. Apparently sales of the Trans Am model doubled within two years of the release of the movie, and even outsold the Chevy Camaro for the first time. Reynolds got the promotional Trans Am (one that was only used to promote the film, but never was used during the actual filming). When Reynolds got into financial difficulties in 2014, one of the things he sold to raise money was that Trans Am. Although estimated to probably go for about $80,000, it eventually sold for $450,000, proving once again the impact the movie had on it's fan base.

Well folks, this old Plymouth would be left in the dust if it had to make that trip, but at least I can count on it to get me home. Come back tomorrow for The 7th Voyage of Sinbad!

 

Drive safely, folks.

Quiggy

 


 

 

 

The Kickoff of the Celebrate the Drive-In Week

 


June 6 is officially Drive-In Movie day. From a post I made early in the start of this blog: 

The first drive-in theater appeared in New Jersey in 1933, the inspiration of a guy named Richard Hollingshead.  He worked out the details in his front yard, then used the information to open the first one.  More opened over the next few years, but it really didn't take off as a phenomenon, until after the development of car speakers in 1941.  (Imagine the noise regulations broken by having to broadcast the sound from one central point before that!!!)

The drive-in movie theater was an experience that is sorely missed today. Although quite a few indoor theaters have added some bonuses that you previously couldn't get in multiplexes (such as selling beer and alcohol, for one, and real, fairly decent food, rather than just popcorn and candy), there are some things they just can't duplicate. 

My favorite memories of my childhood were when Dad would take us to a movie at the drive-in. It was kind of like camping out. When I got old enough to drive myself, many is the time I would go to the drive-in with friends. The camaraderie aspect of it improved when you could carry on conversation during the movie. (Try that at your multiplex... You'll be lucky if all they do is tell you to pipe down...) 

To celebrate the drive-in movie I created this tribute. For my part I am posting a movie a week that more or less exemplifies the kinds of movies you got at the drive-in, some of which were NOT the kind of films you would see at the local indoor theater. But also I am encouraging you to put a memory or a movie review on your own blog. Prizes are going to be awarded for those who choose to play along. See the original announcement post for details here: Celebrate the Drive-In Week.  

Here is a list of people joining the fun. It will be updated as more people join.

Angelman's Place: A tribute to Grease
The Midnite Drive-In: Smokey and the Bandit 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, May 30, 2026

A Drive-In Movie List Game:

The official start of this event isn't until tomorrow, but here's a preview.

 

 

In the Celebrate The Drive-In Week  I came up with the following, for those of you who may want to participate. Leave a link in the comments section below if you do post a list on your blog and you will get an entry in the prize giveaway happening at the end of the week. See the announcement page for the prizes.

 


 

As I have stated elsewhere, drive-in movies had a more "sensational" aspect than anything that typically got nominated for Oscars. In the profile I wrote for Classic Movie Blog Association (CMBA) I said that drive-in films typically could be distilled down to what I called "the three 'B's: Beasts, bikes and babes". There was a bit more than just that, of course. So in the interest of the celebration I am asking for your favorite films in several categories that typically cropped up in drive-in movies. Your choices don't necessarily have to be strictly low budget fare that was the essence of the typical drive-in flick, however. If Star Wars, for instance, is your "favorite science fiction movie featuring aliens", fine, list that one. You'll note that a few of my choices are closer to standard fare.  Have fun.

 


 

 

1. What is your favorite science fiction movie featuring aliens? 

Mine would be my #1 favorite movie: The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai

2. What is your favorite science fiction movie that has no aliens? 

Mine would be 12 Monkeys

3. What is your favorite movie featuring action heroes or superheroes?

Mine would have to be Flash Gordon.

4.  What is your favorite movie featuring outcasts or antiheroes?

Mine would be the first Rambo film, First Blood

5. What is your favorite horror movie featuring monsters?

Mine would be the original Japanese version of Godzilla. 

6. What is your favorite horror movie that has NO monster?

Mine is Jaws. (I don't consider a shark a "monster").  

7. What is your favorite movie featuring motorcycles or cars?

Mine would be the two Cannonball Run films.

8. What is your favorite movie featuring gangs or criminals?

No question here. My #2 all time favorite film: The Warriors. 

9. What is your favorite movie featuring war or war settings?

Mine would be The Great Escape.

10. What is your favorite movie featuring a mystery?

Mine would be The Maltese Falcon. 

11. What is your favorite movie western?

Mine would be El Dorado. 

12. What is your favorite adventure film? 

Mine would be any of the Indiana Jones films.

13. What is your favorite movie featuring a female lead?

How can you go wrong with Sigourney Weaver (Alienswhich I need to review... 

14. What is your favorite movie featuring beaches and rock and roll?

Mine is The Horror of Party Beach (which I also need to get around to reviewing)  

That list doesn't include all of the themes that cropped up in drive-in films, of course, and I could subdivide some of those categories even further. For instance, science fiction has numerous possibilities of esoteric topics; time travel, hidden worlds on Earth, robots and AI, mad scientists etc. Feel free to add more on your post if you wish. The important thing is to have fun.

Quiggy

 


 

Friday, May 29, 2026

Beautiful. But Beware!

 





This is my entry in the Marilyn Monroe Blogathon hosted by Hoofers and Honeys.

 


 

 

The story behind Marilyn Monroe is full of the kind of stuff that makes gossip columnists salivate. From her highly publicized marriages to baseball great Joe DiMaggio and playwright Arthur Miller, to her rumored dalliances with the President of the United States, John F. Kennedy and her scandal inducing appearance in Playboy magazine, nearly everything about Marilyn's life was on display to the public. Much of the publicity was probably engineered on purpose by Marilyn herself. 

One of the more interesting events I found in Marilyn's "life in the public eye" story was when a shoulder strap snapped on her dress during a press conference, possibly making Marilyn the inventor of the "wardrobe malfunction"... It's hard to believe, after reading about her career, that much of her public persona happened without her engineering it to her advantage.   

 

 


 

 

Don't Bother to Knock (1952):

This film is somewhat of an anomaly in the albeit way too short film career of Marilyn Monroe. But it is a window into what she might have been if she hadn't been so entrenched into the ditzy blonde sexpot image that made up her filmography. Completely out of character compared to most of the rest of her roles, here she is a plain Jane character who is just slightly off, mentally.  (Slightly?) 

The story was based on a suspense novel, Mischief by Charlotte Armstrong. It's probably safe to say that the 1950's public was not ready for such a stark character as Nell (Marilyn Monroe). It comes out within the film that she had been in a relationship with a man named Phillip who had been a pilot in WWII and had been killed in action. The death of her boyfriend ultimately had caused her to land in a mental institution, but she had been released recently, pronounced cured. But that may not be the case.


 

Nell's uncle, Eddie (Elisha Cook, Jr.), has been helping her and arranged for her to be a babysitter for a couple staying at the McKinley Hotel, where Eddie works as an elevator operator. Eddie is unaware that Nell may not be quite as "cured" as everyone has been led to believe. 

 



As such he is confident that she will make a good babysitter for Bunny Jones (Debbie Corcoran). Bunny's parents, Peter and Ruth (played Jim Backus and Lurene Tuttle) leave Bunny in the hands of Nell while Peter is in attendance to an awards celebration downstairs in the ballroom.


 

Nell shows the beginnings of her instability when, after seeing Bunny safely to bed, she takes advantage of the situation, putting on a nélilgeé and jewelry that belongs to Ruth. Meanwhile, in a room across the way, Jed (Richard Widmark) sees her through the window and tries to hook up with her by phone. 


 

Jed is in town because he had come to try to patch up a relationship with his own girlfriend, Lyn (Anne Bancroft in her first film). Lyn works as a lounge singer in the hotel ballroom.


 

Jed is looking basically for someone on the rebound from his broken relationship with Lyn. Part of the reason that Jed and Lyn are having trouble is because Jed is somewhat a cad, not caring too much about others but himself. 

Eddie keeps showing up, and he is flabbergasted, first by the fact that Nell has raided a guest's wardrobe, and then later by the fact that Nell has invited a stranger into the hotel, when she was supposed to be just babysitting Bunny.

Jed gradually starts to realize something is a little off with Nell, especially when she starts acting like he, Jed, is the return of the dead boyfriend. Nell is gradually losing it. Bunny is in danger now, too, because she knows too much. Nell ties her up and gags her because she is convinced that Bunny is threatening her progress in finding love, with Jed, or more realistically in her mind, Phillip.

More danger makes it's way into the story when a nosy guest, Emma (Verna Felton), becomes suspicious of what is going on in the room across the way, especially after sees young Bunny in the window and Nell almost push her out.

 

 

This film noir output is one that probably gets overlooked when discussing Marilyn's oeuvre. She had played more serious roles before, but none of them came close to matching the unhinged character of Nell. The character of Nell and her mental instability is foreshadowed early on when a close up of her wrists indicate that she had tried to commit suicide at some point in her past (hence the reason she had been installed in a mental institution earlier). 

The hardest part of the movie to accept is the ending when, after Nell has been escorted away by the police, it appears that Lyn and Jed may have a newfound respect for each other. Now, be honest, ladies... if you found out the guy you had an on-again off-again relationship was making time with a girl who looked like Marilyn Monroe not 15 minutes after you told him you wanted to break off the relationship, would you be so receptive as to take him back? Sometimes that Breen finger in the pie gets a tad annoying, if you ask me.  Gotta end on a happy note, no matter what...

Give this movie a shot. Marilyn may not be Oscar material in this outing, but it will definitely open your eyes to what could have been her potential. Maybe a bad example on my part, but I could easily see her in the role of Jason's mom (Betsy Palmer) from Friday the 13th, maybe even in the role of Alex (Glenn Close) in Fatal Instinct. I think she plays the role of the unhinged femme fatale pretty well.  

Well, that wraps up today's jaunt into the film world. Drive safely folks.

Quiggy


 

Monday, May 25, 2026

Book Review: I Hated, Hated, HATED This Movie by Roger Ebert



I Hated, Hated, HATED This Movie by Roger Ebert


As I have stated numerous times, both in conversations with fellow film fanatics and on this blog, telling me a movie is a  bad movie is akin to saying "I DARE you to watch this turkey of a movie". 

I don't always fall in line with the opinions of Roger Ebert. Or any of the other "professional" movie reviewers for that matter... (I don't care what the highbrows say about it, I think Citizen Kane is an overrated piece of crap, for instance). I use quotes from the professionals in my reviews mainly as a way to parallel or contrast my own opinion of movies. And, personally, I think anyone who depends on a reviewer to guide their movie experience to be limiting themselves. That would even include using my own reviews to guide your experiences, BTW. 

But I am not above letting a collection of reviews lead me to movies that I might not have ever noticed if I hadn't seen those reviews. Especially in the realm of those bad movies; the ones that are decried from the rooftops as being basically "not worth your time". I came across this book and Ebert's follow up on bad movies, Your Movie Sucks, at a resale place a week or so ago. 

The great thing about reading books like this is that it points out films that somehow escaped my notice, either because I never saw it on the shelf at the used DVD store or, in some cases, because the title never would have attracted my attention in the first place. When Ebert (or whomever) is so adamantly dismissive of the film, and the review delves into areas that seem a bit outlandish, it sometimes makes me say "Hey, can it really be THAT bad?" 

And in some cases, the review makes me say "Oh, I just HAVE to check this one out!" One in particular that appears in this volume is Turbulence (which I am going to watch after I write this review). Click this link to read his review, if you want to see why.

I enjoyed the book. Of course, I can't say his opinions always gelled with mine. He apparently didn't like either of the Cannonball Run films (Cannonball Run II is the only one in which his review was reprinted in this volume). He also didn't think much of the Home Alone films (once again, only his review of Home Alone 2: Lost in New York is in this volume). Death Race 2000 happens to be one of my favorite movies, but Ebert gave it a "no stars" rating. (To which I say "phhht, Roger!)

I have to agree with his take on the Neil Diamond film version of The Jazz Singer. And I only watched the Kevin Costner dud The Postman once, when it came to theaters. I think his 1½ stars is vastly generous on that one. One of these days I will watch it again for The Midnite Drive-In, but I will reveal in advance that, although I have never actually followed through on the idea, it is the one movie I came closest to walking out on when I saw it.

Quite a number of the movies here are ones that I have seen and have yet to add to this blog, and I am adding a couple more besides the above-mentioned Turbulence  to my list of movies I need to check out, simply because the review made them seem outlandish enough to appeal to my peculiar tastes. I think Roger Ebert was one of the most entertaining movie reviewers, and this book didn't let me down. Give me a week or so and I will add a review for the other volume I bought, Your Movie Sucks.

Happy reading, folks.

Quiggy


Sunday, May 24, 2026

Semiquincentennial Movie Project #21: The Untouchables

 

 

 

The Semiquincentennial  Movie Project is an ongoing celebration of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. During the course of this project your humble blogger is choosing a movie a week to represent each of the 50 states in the Union, as well as a movie scheduled for 4th of July weekend that will represent the nation's capitol, Washington D.C. The order of the weekly entries will coincide with the order of each state's entry into the fold (although, not necessarily coinciding with the date of their entry into said fold).

 



Week #21: Illinois-

 

 

 
The state of Illinois was established on December 3, 1818

Details about Illinois:

State bird: cardinal

State flower: violet

State tree: wild oak

Additional historical trivia:

You might THINK it was in New York, but officially the first building that could be classified as a "skyscraper" was built in Chicago. 

Twinkies were invented in Schiller Park.

The first Dairy Queen opened for business in Illinois. 

Ray Kroc opened the first McDonald's outside of California in Des Plaines. Kroc was from Illinois. (Now, I'm hungry...)

The famous Route 66 has it's starting point in Chicago. Or ending point if you are starting in California...

 Illinois was the first state to ratify the 13th Amendment which outlawed slavery.

The world's largest public library is in Chicago. 

Famous people born in Illinois" U.S. President Ronald Reagan, Ray Kroc,  Harrison Ford, Hugh Hefner, Walt Disney, Pope Leo XIV, Jimmy Connors and John Belushi.

 


 

The Untouchables (1987): 

The most famous gangster in the history of the United States would almost surely be Al Capone. While the history behind the efforts of the Federal government to put an end to Al Capone's reign as the crime boss of Chicago may be known to most people, it is a sure bet that only the most knowledgeable students have more than a passing acquaintance with the details. Most people probably only know the story from either the TV series with Robert Stack, or from this film.


 

The fact is that both are entirely reliant on dramatic license to tell a story and are filled with stuff that was rearranged or even invented out of whole cloth. One thing in particular that stands out in the film is that Eliot Ness and Al Capone had virtually no face to face interaction during the era. One site I read claims that Ness was only interacting with Capone when he served as one of the escorts that took Capone to prison after his trial.

That does not mean that Brian De Palma's film should be avoided completely, however, unless you are one of those people who demand strict historical accuracy in your films that deal with history. Instead, you could just look on this film as a well crafted fictional story and come away from it with a feeling of satisfaction.

As I have noted elsewhere, I am not a big fan of Kevin Costner. In fact, if it wasn't for the presence of Robert De Niro and Sean Connery in this film, I doubt if I would have as much appreciation for it, at least from an acting viewpoint. 


 


There is not much of Costner's portrayal that really connects with me. Roger Ebert in his review sums it up for me that he doesn't provide "any of the little twists and turns of character that might have made Ness into an individual", although he puts the blame more on David Mamet's script rather than on the actor himself.

Connery won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for his work, but De Niro was virtually ignored. I thought that De Niro was equally worthy of at least a nomination, even though some reviews claimed he was basically just going through the motions. 

The film opens with a scene that somehow just doesn't ring true, at least for me. Capone (Robert DeNiro) is getting a shave while interviewers are asking him questions about his status as a figure in town of note. Somehow I just can't see Capone openly admitting to being involved in bootlegging to the press. Maybe the real Al Capone actually was forthright in his activities in real life: it's not as if no one even knew he existed at that point in time. But it just feels odd.


 

Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner) makes his appearance at the police headquarters and establishes his "goody two-shoes" persona when he makes it known that he is there to enforce Prohibition and take down those who would flaunt the law, including establishing that from that point forward, if the officers in his force had previously ignored the law before, there were expected to be paragons of virtue henceforth. Historically speaking, however, it was NOT against the law to drink during Prohibition, it was only against the law to make, transport or sell the stuff. Many people hoarded previously legal stashes that they got before Prohibition went into effect. 

Ness first finds out what he is up against when he makes a raid on a place that supposedly has a shipment of the illegal contraband, but instead of finding liquor he finds... umbrellas. It becomes apparent that there was a betrayal of his raid plans from within the force. As Malone (Sean Connery) tells Ness later in the movie, the town of Chicago "stinks like a whorehouse at low tide."


 

 Which is why, after convincing Malone to join his team, Malone says that they need to pull in some help from the newbies to the force. "If you're afraid of getting a bad apple, don't go to the barrel. Get it off the tree." So Malone and Ness go to the training section of the academy, looking for a man who is a good shot and honest (as in not corrupted by the graft that is rampant on the force).


 

The scene where they recruit George Stone (Andy Garcia) is one of my favorite scenes as far as dialogue. Malone and Stone have a tête-à-tête in which Malone queries Stone about his heritage: 

Malone: Stone? George Stone? What's you real name?
Stone: That is my real name.
Malone: Nah. What was it before you changed it?
Stone: Giuseppe Petri.
Malone: Ah! I knew it. That's all you need is one thieving wop on the team.
Stone: It's much better than you, you stinking Irish pig. (Both pull weapons).
Malone: Oh, I like him....
 

Also to come on board is a rather milquetoast addition, Oscar Wallace (Charles Martin Smith) who is an accountant in his real life. He is not initially what you would expect for a gun-toting gung ho federal agent, although he does develop over the course of his activities. Wallace thinks the best way, however, to take down Capone is to find information that would help to prosecute Capone for tax evasion.


 

Ness: Try a murderer for tax evasion?
Wallace: Well, it's better than nothing...
 

There are some great scenes in the second half of the film. Ness and his cohorts look to try to stop a shipment of contraband coming across the border from Canada. At one point one of the bootleggers is killed while trying to shoot it out with Ness. A short time later, while Malone is struggling to get another captive to open up about his connections he uses the corpse as an unorthodox incentive to get the prisoner to confess. I won't go into detail here, but it really is one of the scenes that probably swayed the Oscar voting to give Connery the statuette,


 

One of the other scenes that really stands out is a shootout at the train station. In an homage to a scene from Sergei Eisenstein's classic silent era film Battleship Potemkin,  the scene is staged on a series of steps in the train station. It is ten minutes of very intense action, and plays out with several parallels to the Russian classic.


 

There is one scene that happens late in the movie that is entirely fictional, and one of the few scenes that irks me due to it's unbelievable situation. Ness has an encounter with Frank Nitti (Billy Drago) on top of the courthouse. The ending, although it somehow fits in the context of the way that the story has been played out in this fictional account, does not seem to ring true with the character of Ness as he has been played out up to this point. Once again, I am going to leave it to the audience to watch the film and judge for themselves.


 

Ultimately, of course, and it's not a spoiler since this part is historical, Capone ends up being convicted of tax evasion. Historically speaking, that may have been the only way it was going to play out, since the Capone organization was powerful enough to keep the crime boss out of jail for his more overt illegal activities.

While The Untouchables  has it's issues with it's historical accuracy, the film is a stand out for the efforts that the director and the majority of the actors bring to the screen. Even some of the minor characters are memorable. I particularly liked Police Chief Mike Dorsett's (Richard Bradford) brief scenes when he interacted with Connery in the back alley fight. Dorsett is not as bad as it would all seem. I think he genuinely cares about Malone, even if Malone is opposed to the status quo (i.e. the bribery and corruption) in which Dorsett is involved.

This film ranks fairly high in lists of great gangster movies. One book I have in my collection, The Ultimate Book of Great Gangster Movies by  George Anastasia and Glen Macnow puts it at #28, while the Ranker website puts it in at # 11. (It should come as no surprise that both of those put the first two The Godfather films as #1 and #2). My personal list would probably have it at #5, behind those first two The Godfather films, followed closely by Goodfellas and Little Caesar. (Sorry Pulp Fiction fans...)

Well, that wraps up this week's entry. Drive safely, folks.

Quiggy