Celebrate the Drive-In Week: Drive-In

Celebrate the Drive-In is a tribute to a beloved venue of the past. During it's heyday, a trip to the drive-in was one of my favorite things, both on the rare occasions as a child, and in my early adulthood. This blog is going to celebrate Drive-In Day (June 6) with a series of movies that I was too young to see (or in a couple of cases, not even born yet) that I wish I could've experienced in a drive-in. Keep coming back for the entire week as there will be one per day for the duration.

It's Saturday night! Let's go somewhere where we can party like Monday isn't a school day! Presenting the next Coming Attraction! Drive-In!

 

The word "kismet" comes to mind. What better way to wrap up the Celebrate the Drive-In Week than with a movie titled Drive-In?

I would be highly surprised if you have heard of any of the actors and actresses that populate the cast of this movie.  Hell, the director is probably the most prominent name in the credits, Rod Amateau...  He directed most of the episodes of the 50's TV shows The George Burns and Gracie Allen Show and The Bob Cummings Show, as well as most of the episodes of the 60's TV show The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis. He was primarily a TV director, although he did branch out occasionally to direct feature films. If you are, like me, a devotee of really bad movies, he was also responsible for The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (often cited as one of the "worst movies of all time").

I should point out that not ALL of the actors in this film are complete nobodies. The main character of Orville is played by Glenn Morshower, who had a recurring role on the TV show 24 over the span of it's life as a TV series. And if you saw the film Raising Arizona, Trey Wilson was the bigwig father of the baby that Nicholas Cage and Holly Hunter kidnap. He was also Col. Nivens in a film I reviewed on this blog a few years ago, A Soldier's Story. Still, those two are exceptions. Most of rest of the cast have only this film, or maybe one or two more, to their credit. 

I would also be highly surprised if you don't think "Hey! I've seen this movie before!" The fact is there is almost nothing original going on here. Have you seen American Graffiti? Well, in this movie you get the white bread borderline goody goody redhead who is looking to hang out for one night with his tag along friend (here it's the character's little brother, but still...)  

 

Have you seen Grease? You get the somewhat rough girl who has grown tired of her hoodlum boyfriend as is looking to make a change. Have you seen Dazed and Confused? You get the fight between a guy who is out of his league taking on the hoodlum bigwig who is giving him hassles.  

 

Have you seen a movie (hundreds of possible comparisons here) where a wide-eyed African American is played up for laughs? Here the guy is a doctor instead of the typical stereotyped servant, but still the similarities come through.

 

The movie playing at the drive-in in the movie is not even original. Parodies of disaster flicks such as Airplane! and The Big Bus played out the theme with a bit more panache. But, in fact, most of the really funny parts of Drive-In occur in the movie within the movie (here titled Disaster '76), although I'm not entirely sure if Disaster '76 was intentionally meant as a parody, at least within the context of it's presentation to the audience in the film. That fake film uses some pretty funny stuff as it comes off like a parody of Airplane!, The Towering Inferno and Jaws, all rolled into one. But I think that the movie itself was supposed to be a serious disaster flick to the characters at the drive-in premiere.

 

Really, one of the better parts of Drive-In are some of the unique places where the soundtrack plays along with the action on the screen. The soundtrack is an anomaly, at least for a film that was made in 1976, and has a mostly teen cast. Instead of pop and rock songs, the soundtrack is filled with country(?) music. OK, so the movie takes place in west TEXAS, and probably more of the populace in that region were listening to the local country station as opposed to a pop / American Top 40 station, so maybe it was fitting in terms of it's setting.

The Statler Brothers song, "Whatever Happened to Randolph Scott?" plays over the opening credits (which credits, by the way, does not include the actors names... those don't come until the end credits. But like I said at the beginning, you probably don't know any of these people anyway...) The lyrics to that song fit along very well with the story as it plays out, however.

"Everybody knows when you go to the show you can't take the kids along.
You've gotta read the paper and know the code of G, PG and R and X.
And you gotta know what the movie's about before you even go.
Tex Ritter's gone and Disney's dead and the screen is filled with sex.

Whatever happened to Randolph Scott ridin' the trail alone?
Whatever happened to Gene and Tex and Roy and Rex, the Durango Kid?
Oh, whatever happened to Randolph Scott, his horse plain as could be?
Whatever happened to Randolph Scott has happened to the best of me.

Everybody's tryin' to make a comment about our doubts and fears.
True Grit's the only movie I've really understood in years.
You gotta take your analyst along to see if it's fit to see.
Whatever happened to Randolph Scott has happened to the industry.

Whatever happened to Johnny Mack Brown and Alan Rocky Lane?
Whatever happened to Lash LaRue? I'd love to see them again.
Whatever happened to Smiley Burnette Tim Holt and Gene Autry?
Whatever happened to all of these has happened to the best of me.

Whatever happened to Randolph Scott has happened to the industry."

 

Hey, as nostalgic and somewhat idealistic as it sounds, there were, and probably still are, people who feel the same way. My sister would be one of those. (And, no, she didn't watch this with me...)

 

 

  

Drive-In (1976):

In the summer of 1976, everybody in the small Texas town in this film are preparing for the event of the summer, a premiere of a new disaster movie, Disaster '76. (This is the glue that holds the film together, ostensibly.  There are a few subplots going on, but none of them would be enough to make this film interesting if they were the sole focus.) 

Note: The town, BTW, is never actually named, but it was filmed in Terrell, TX, which at the time only had about 15,000 population. So the small town feel comes through. And Terrell had it's own drive-in theater at the time which was used as the location for the drive-in in the film. Elsewhere I found out that that drive-in has been replaced by a bank... So their reminiscences probably parallel mine on the drive-in experience.

The main characters include Orville (Glenn Morshower) and his little brother (Gary Lee Cavagnaro). The brother (credited by the name "Little Bit", although I don't recall anybody in the film addressing him by any name), is looking up to his older brother, but is dismissive of being able to learn how to approach women, since he basically views Orville as a dweeb. 

 

Also, there is Glowie (Lisa Lemole; who is now better known to people as the wife of Dr. Oz, so maybe there is one more person in the film you might recognize...) Glowie has had a relationship with the leader of a pack of town hoodlums, Enoch (Billy Milliken), but she has grown increasingly frustrated with Enoch, probably mainly because he treats her like property instead of as an individual.

 

You can probably see the conflict coming a mile away, since early on Glowie hooks up with Orville, not only to the surprise of Little Bit, but also to the surprise of Orville himself.  Orville is not entirely on board with this new relationship, mostly because he has not had much success in attracting female companionship in his life. I think he is just a little "so, what's the catch..." viewpoint, which I would feel pretty much the same way, since I too was kind of like that when I was the same age. 

At the same time as all of this is going on, two rather dimwitted would be thieves are planning to rob the drive-in of it's cash collection. Gifford (Trey Wilson) and Will (Gordon Hurst) would be better off if they gave up the life of petty crime and instead went to Detroit to train to be diesel mechanics, as one of them suggests.  If you watch these two in action you may just wonder how they ever had any previous successes at their endeavors in crime. Although listening to them talk, I'm not sure that "success" was ever a part of their vocabulary...

 

The other running story in this film is about a gang called The Widow Makers (of which Enoch is the leader). Why are they called The Widow Makers? Who the hell knows? They seem to be some kind of nod to a motorcycle gang, except they don't ride around on motorcycles... Instead they drive around in a cheesy decked out van that looks like something that a disco dude would drive. 

 

They are on the lookout for a rival gang at the drive-in where they are hoping to have a rumble. The Widow Makers don't look like they could cause much fear, however. Looks like a gang of senior citizens could take them out with no problem. For that matter, so does the other gang (who also do their running around in a van...)

Enoch, having just been told by Glowie to go fly his kite in someone else's front yard, is also looking for the dude that Glowie left him for, who, coincidentally is also the guy who knocked the driver's side door of his van off it's hinges. And, as you found out from earlier in this review, is the town dweeb. The showdown at high noon midnight 9:17 PM is one of the focal events that happen at the drive-in that night, but it doesn't inspire an nail-biting, or for that matter any thumb twidgeting... 

The most exciting action in the entire movie is a car chase that occurs in the parking lot after our two bumbling desperadoes try to escape with the cash box. A would be hero, Bill (Kent Perkins, who, BTW, was married to Ruth Buzzi), chases the doofuses around the place, leading to one of the few times that I laughed at something that wasn't on the drive-in screen.   

 

And, of course, you couldn't have a 70's teen movie without an obligatory scene with someone smoking wacky tobacky...  A guy has taken his mother to see the picture, and when she complains about his hospitality, bemoaning the fact that he doesn't even offer her a cigarette, he obliges, but not with the kind of cigarette she was expecting....

 

 

It may take a concerted effort on your part to follow the plot lines of these individual characters, and just maybe you won't be entirely successful. But as I hinted earlier, it is worth a watch just to watch the scenes that are playing out on the theater screen. Word of warning, however: There is a scene in the film within the film where a plane crashes into a skyscraper. While this may have been funny in it's original playing, it is not at all funny now, given the recent history. But I think it is not entirely fair to retroactively judge it as ALL in bad taste. This movie was made in 1976, 35 years away from those horrific events of 9/11. 

The film has its share of incoherent scenes. I chalk this up to the mish mash writing by the screenwriter, who apparently tried to jam any references to current movies he could into one script. For instance, there is one scene early in the film where a semi driver is being chased by the local cops. He thinks he's ditched them when he hides the truck behind a building, but he's wrong. The problem with this scene is that driver never makes another appearance in the film, ever. So what was the point of the scene, other than to establish that this town does indeed have a police department? The best excuse I can come up with is it was some kind of nod to trucker movies (although the iconic trucker film,  Smokey and the Bandit, was still a year away from appearing on the big screen). 

In terms of reception of this movie, I really liked what Gene Siskel had to say: He gave the film 2 out of 4 stars and said he wished the film had been focused on fleshing out the fake movie, Disaster '76, rather than the activities going on in the theater. In the wikipedia article on the film, it apparently was received as a decent typical juvenile effort, not disparaged, but not lauded either, so Siskel's 2 out of 4 is probably about the same as the rest of the reviews at the time. Rotten Tomatoes has the film at 53% Fresh. I couldn't find any information on what kind of profit the movie made, but given that it had no big name stars, it probably didn't cost a hell of a lot to make. I bet the biggest expense was renting the drive-in theater where the film was made. So a profit was probably a foregone conclusion.

As to my opinion: I have to admit this movie did have a small bit of appeal, but it's definitely not in my top 100 of movies I've seen. Give it a shot, but don't expect too much. I will say it is a damn sight better than the director's other foray into big screen work, the aforementioned The Garbage Pail Kids Movie. But, then, watching a marbles tournament would be more interesting than THAT one...

That's it for today, folks. And also a wrap-up for the Celebrate the Drive-In Week event. Hope you all had fun. Drive safely.

Quiggy

 

 

Celebrate the Drive-In Week: Hot Rod Girl

Celebrate the Drive-In is a tribute to a beloved venue of the past. During it's heyday, a trip to the drive-in was one of my favorite things, both on the rare occasions as a child, and in my early adulthood. This blog is going to celebrate Drive-In Day (Jun 6) with a series of movies that I was too young to see (or in a couple of cases, not even born yet) that I wish I could've experienced in a drive-in. Keep coming back for the entire week as there will be one per day for the duration.

Don't! That's it. Just "Don't!" Presenting the next Coming Attraction! Hot Rod Girl!

 

"It's 10 o'clock. Do you know where your children are?"

                                     -quote from a television '70's PSA 

 

The above quote could have been inspired by the kinds of events that happened in this film. The movie poster says it all: "Are these our children?" it asks. Given that this is an American International Pictures film, whose main fare was designed to lure teenagers into coming to see them, this sets up an interesting question: Just who was the intended audience of this film? Perhaps that question could best be answered by the fact that this film was originally released to drive-in theaters as a double feature, with the other film being titled Girls in Prison (and I leave it up to you to determine what the focus of THAT movie was...)

 

There are several other questions that will come to mind if you watch this film. For one thing: the movie is titled "Hot Rod Girl", but except for the opening sequence the main girl, the one I assume is the "hot rod girl" the title refers to, is not seen hot rodding in the film. The other scenes in which Lisa appears show her driving rather sedately,

Another thing: the poster also trumpets "Rock 'N Roll", yet the music is almost entirely modern jazz and bebop music, not the kind of rock, or rockabilly, "rock 'n roll" you would expect coming out of the speakers. And the guys and gals in the film snap their fingers to the beat coming from the jukebox as if they are hipsters in a jazz coffeehouse. The music was written by Alexander Courage. Yes, the same Alexander Courage that Star Trek fans will recognize as the writer of the theme to the original Star Trek TV series. 

The film is full of some pretty laughable dialogue, as the main teen characters engage in some banter that, while maybe true to the characters and even the teen audience watching the film, comes off as pretty funny. That said, it's not a bad movie plot wise, although it is somewhat formulaic. But given the intended audience, and the low budget tendencies of the production company, that is to be expected.

The titular Hot Rod Girl, Lori Nelson, only had a brief career in film and TV, playing mostly as secondary characters in TV and film, although for one season she was the star of a TV show called How to Marry A Millionaire, based on the Marilyn Monroe movie. I would guess that the main reason she abandoned Hollywood stardom was to be a wife and mother. Interesting credit: She starred with John Agar in Revenge of the Creature in 1955, a sequel to Creature from the Black Lagoon, and then 50 years later, in 2005, she reprised her role in The Naked Monster, a parody "sequel" to Revenge. (And, OMG, after watching a trailer for THAT one, I just gotta watch the film...)

The presence of Chuck Connors, TV's The Rifleman, playing an almost carbon copy personality that he would eventually come to be known in that classic TV series is one of the better parts of the film. In addition we also get Dabbs Greer, more well known probably as the reverend on Little House on the Prairie, and Frank Gorshin, ("The Riddler" on the 60's Batman TV show). Gorshin, by the way, is making his first appearance in a credited role in this film.

John Smith (from TV's Cimarron City and Laramie) is the only other big name you might recognize, although many of the rest of the cast did have careers as secondary stars on TV and in film.  The bad guy in this film, Mark Andrews, did not have much of a career, only appearing in a total of 8 roles. His IMDb profile seems to indicate his main job in life was as a fireman, so maybe acting was just a brief sideline. (It says, as a fireman, he once saved a man from drowning).

 

 

 

Hot Rod Girl (1956): 

In the opening sequence, local darling female hot rod driver Lisa Vernon (Lori Nelson) is preparing to show off her driving skills in a drag race at the local drag strip. 

 

The genesis of the drag strip is the inspiration of Detective Ben Merrill (Chuck Connors), a well meaning police officer who is trying to remedy the rampant drag racing by the local teens on city streets, which threaten to endanger the lives of the residents. 

 

But Ben's dream of solving the issue of the illegal drag racing is up against another blockade. See, the citizens of the town don't want the city streets being used for illicit racing, but they are also so tight-assed that they don't want a drag strip outside the city either. You get the idea that the city fathers would be just as happy if they didn't give driver's licenses to anyone under the age of about 40. (There are no adults in the film other than Ben, his boss (Russell Thorson),  and Yo-Yo (Fred Essler), the local diner operator, so this reluctance is only played out through the conversations that Ben has with his boss).

 

Jeff (John Smith) and his brother Steve (Del Erickson) are driving around town after the race when a hot rodder goads Steve into racing, and the result is Steve is killed. For some reason the authorities blame Jeff, seemingly because he didn't exercise enough influence to convince his brother to NOT race. So they take away Jeff's driver's license. (Huh?).

 

Jeff becomes depressed ad throws himself into his work, as a mechanic, in the process neglecting his girlfriend, Lisa (Lori Nelson), the "hot rod girl" of this film.  Which makes her the perfect attraction for the newcomer in town, Bronc (Mark Andrews). 

 

It doesn't help that she is the odd girl out since her friends, Flat Top (Frank Gorshin) and Two Tanks (Eddie Ryder) and their girlfriends, L.P. (Roxanne Arlen) and Judy (Caroline Kearney) are more interested in each other than the hanger-on, Lisa.

 

Newcomer Bronc is an obnoxious clod and goads Flat Top into a game of chicken. Which, if you are not familiar, is a "game" where two people get into their cars and drive flat out towards each other. The loser is the one who chickens out first.  Flat Top is that guy. Which ends up making Bronc even more cocky than he already is.

 

Ben sees Bronc for the threat he actually is, and in an effort to get him to leave makes Bronc go to the drag strip with his car. But Jeff, who is in charge of clearing all drivers and their cars disqualifies Bronc's car as not being safe enough to participate. Which of course makes Bronc mad. Instead of leaving town he vows to get revenge.

 

On a mountain road outside of town he tries to get Jeff, who is just out for a drive with Lisa, to race. Ultimately another accident occurs, with a kid on a bicycle getting killed. Based on Bronc's testimony, Jeff becomes accused of being the culprit, but Ben is not so sure.

 

Ultimately Hot Rod Girl is a typical teen movie as the kind that AIP put out at the time, featuring sex (50's family safe sex, but sex nonetheless), cars and rock 'n roll (or bebop jazz posing as rock 'n roll, anyway...) It does seem to have a family friendly message to it, though, unlike may of AIP's output. The message being that one should drive safely on the city streets and county roads and save the drag racing for the local legal dragstrip. Cheaply made, it had an appeal to it's intended crowd. It got fair to middling reviews at the time, and one reviewer noted that it was less exploitational than it's title implied.

That, I would say is an accurate description. One would expect with a title like Hot Rod Girl that there was some extremely hot subjects being addressed within the film, but the women in this movie are all the kind of women that you wouldn't be nervous about introducing to your mother. There isn't even a hint of implied sexuality, although both Flat Top and Two Tanks do have a slight hint of misogynistic tendencies, putting down their girlfriends on occasion. One wonders what these girls see in these guys. The only really polite guy when it comes to his female counterpart is Jeff.

Is it top tier cinema? Hardly. See The Born Losers, reviewed earlier this week, for much better drama and very much better bad guys. Mark Andrews' Bronc is not much more threatening than Fonzie, even the Fonzie that appeared in his introductory appearance  on Happy Days. Although, Jeff Smith could easily give Richie Cunningham a run for his money on the goody goody side, if Richie were a bit more introspective.

Still, it is worth checking out.

See you tomorrow. Drive safely, folks. Really. Drive safely. Don't get suckered into drag racing with that guy in the Corvette next to you in the theater. Come back tomorrow for Drive-In!

Quiggy

 

  

  

Celebrate the Drive-In: Coffy

Celebrate the Drive-In is a tribute to a beloved venue of the past. During it's heyday, a trip to the drive-in was one of my favorite things, both on the rare occasions as a child, and in my early adulthood. This blog is going to celebrate Drive-In Day (Jun 6) with a series of movies that I was too young to see (or in a couple of cases, not even born yet) that I wish I could've experienced in a drive-in. Keep coming back for the entire week as there will be one per day for the duration.

 

Women! Can't live with them, can't shoot them! Presenting the next Coming Attraction! Coffy!

 

 

One of the tropes of the era of 70's film was the one termed as "blaxploitation". For a brief period from about 1969 to 1979 Hollywood attempted to appeal to a sector of the populace, the black audience, by producing films that were supposed to draw in a viewership of the country that did not find movie figures that it could relate to in the standard fare of the day.  

Blaxploitation is a portmanteau word, combining "black" and "exploitation". It was coined by Junius Griffin, the leader of the Beverly Hills NAACP. It was not meant to be a complimentary word. Griffin was pointing out that, by making movies that depicted blacks as power figures in the community, but as mainly working in the criminal world, was no better than the previous tradition of depicting them as subservient.

The Hollywood machine was influenced by the rising Black Power movement in this respect. The idea did have some merit, whether or not their hearts were in the right place. The basic idea was to present black people as being in control of their own destinies, without having to answer to "The Man" (the white people). While it did provide an outlet for the populace to see black people in more prominent roles, it wasn't necessarily well received by said populace.

Among the people who spoke out against this new trend was Jesse Jackson, who criticized the trend because it tended to promote a different type of stereotype, making the black person a caricature in a different form. Instead of the "yassuh, boss" caricature, the films promoted the idea that black people were violent hypersexual criminals. Often in these films the main character was working in unsavory roles; pimps, pushers, etc.

On some rare occasions the main character would be a character working on the right side of the law, but even those characters would often be less scrupulous about their actions than their white counterparts. Shaft featured Richard Roundtree as a private detective who had no qualms about taking the law into his own hands. Truck Turner starred Isaac Hayes as a bounty hunter and Black Belt Jones had Jim Kelly going head to head with the Mafia, both of which had their hearts in the right place, even if the execution of their ideals would have caused Superman to recoil in shock.

Rarer still were the use of females in starring roles. Pam Grier made a career out starring in these kinds of films, and her characters were often characterized as "embodying strength, style and resilience". She was one of the first, if not the first female action star. She got her start in the "women in prison" genre with such films as The Big Doll House (her first starring role), Women in Cages and The Big Bird Cage. But she started getting recognition for her potential in action movies with Coffy and Friday Foster.

In terms of blaxploitation films, I think many of her films helped to make the genre more accessible to people like me. She was not on the side of the criminal. Most often she was more of a vigilante, seeking justice in a world where "justice" was a mythical concept. That's why I chose Coffy as a choice for Celebrate the Drive-In Week. Her character in the film has some ideals that appealed to me, even if often she strayed into areas that the law-abiding public might frown on.

Grier went on to many other significant roles. You may remember she made appearances at The Midnite Drive-In several times. She was Wendell Jones' wife in Greased Lightning. She was a former cohort of Snake Plissken in Escape from L.A. She was also in Mars Attacks! and Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey.  She was a favorite of Quentin Tarantino, who cast her as the lead in Jackie Brown in 1997. And as recent as 2023 she was still active, appearing in Pet Semetary: Bloodlines.

By the way, a side note, in case you didn't know: Pam Grier is the sister of Rosey Grier, the former NFL football star turned actor, who made his debut at The Midnite Drive-In last year in The Thing with Two Heads. 

 

    

Coffy (1973):

The protagonist (I hesitate to use the word"hero") of this film is a woman who goes by the name of "Coffy". Her last name is Coffin, so the appellation appears to be derived from that. (Elsewhere I read her name is Flower Child Coffin, but I don't recall it being mentioned in the film...) Coffy is a woman with a mission.

 

 

The first time we meet Coffy is after a man called Grover (Mwako Cumbuka), enters a bar and tells his boss, Sugarman (Morris Buchanan), that he has a surprise waiting for him in his car. When Sugarman gets to the car he finds a woman desperate for a drug fix, willing to "do anything" to get said fix. It turns out, however, that she is just faking it to lure the two to a private session of her own brand of "justice". She executes both of them.

 

Sugarman and Grover

Coffy, in her private life, is a nurse. Her sister, LuBelle, has become a heroin addict, due to LuBelle's dealer, Sugarman. Coffy is determined to rid the world of those she deems responsible.  But Sugarman is only the beginning. As usual in movies like this there are higher ups that are running the show.

Coffy has a friend on the police force, Carter (William Elliot), and at one point she seems on the verge of revealing everything she has been doing in her vigilante role to him. But she backs away at the point, only hinting at the idea that the evil doers dealing drugs in the black community deserve death. 

 

Coffy and Carter having coffee

 

She also has a boyfriend, Howard (Booker Bradshaw), who is an up and comer in the world of politics. He is a city councilman on the verge of being elected to Congress. 

 

Coffy's boyfriend, Howard

 

She continues on her goal, eventually working her way into the "stable" of prostitutes run by a character called King George (Robert DoQui). This is primarily to get in contact with her ultimate drug kingpin goal, Vitroni (Allan Arbus). But in so doing she is also looking to gum up George's drug dealing. She substitutes sugar for his heroin stash.

Coffy and King George

 

Eventually she does get called to Vitroni's house, because Vitroni likes a certain type of girl which Coffy pretends to be to get inside. 

Coffy and Vitroni

 

But her ruse is discovered and she ends up being held captive. And just before Vitroni sends his henchman, Omar (Sid Haig) out on a quest to kill her, she finds out that her "loyal to the people" boyfriend Howard is not all that honest as a politician. 

 

Vitroni and Omar

Of course, Coffy manages to escape her captors and exacts more of her vigilante justice. Including that traitor of a boyfriend...

Despite the drug connection that seemed to be a part and parcel of the typical blaxploitation film, this one has several things that set it apart. For one, it has a resounding anti-drug message. And, of course, there is the fact that the main character is a woman as opposed to the generic male dominated movie. Up until this point women usually played secondary roles that were typical in lots of movies of this type.  Grier, I think, opened the door for many movies yet to come, where a female character could carry the load that was typically left to only male protagonists.

You should be forewarned, however, that the film is not without some titillating (no pun intended) scenes. In other words, several scenes with topless women. This film, being firmly entrenched in the drive-in milieu of the 70's, almost HAD to have that. But the good thing is (almost) none of it comes off as exploitative. They all happen in character with the situation at hand. Both Grier (on screen) and director Jack Hill (off screen) play these scenes well. Occasionally they may come off as a little unnecessary (I refer basically to the all out "catfight" scene in the brothel here; not the brawl itself, just that the ripping of the dresses may not have been all necessary). 

The only real objection I have to the film is the way that Vitrioni and Omar take out King George, believing that George was responsible for sending Coffy to kill him. I won't reveal here what happens, but it absolutely shocking in its execution.

 

Outside of Grier the rest of the cast is pretty unremarkable. But: Does Robert DoQui look familiar? He had pretty extensive career playing cops, but many of you who watch the same kinds of movies I do may immediately recognize him; he was the Detroit police sergeant in charge in the RoboCop films. Allan Arbus may also trigger a "hey, I know that guy!" thought. He was the psychiatrist in several episodes of the TV series M*A*S*H*. And Sid Haig menaced a lot of people in secondary roles throughout his career. None of them really stand out here, however, but that doesn't mean they were just flashes in the pan.

Don't go into this film expecting too much. As a vigilante movie. it pretty much toes the line established in movies that came before it and followed it, plot wise. You should go into it, however, expecting to see the potential from it's lead actress, who surely impacted many actresses who came after her. Is Coffy her best movie? Hardly. But she does put up a good performance.

Until next time, drive safely, folks. Remember, drugs are bad for you. And so are women with a grudge. Come back tomorrow for  Hot Rod Girl! 

Quiggy

  

Celebrate the Drive-In: Day of the Triffids

Celebrate the Drive-In is a tribute to a beloved venue of the past. During it's heyday, a trip to the drive-in was one of my favorite things, both on the rare occasions as a child, and in my early adulthood. This blog is going to celebrate Drive-In Day (Jun 6) with a series of movies that I was too young to see (or in a couple of cases, not even born yet) that I wish I could've experienced in a drive-in. Keep coming back for the entire week as there will be one per day for the duration.

Some days it just doesn't pay to get up and water the plants! Presenting the next Coming Attraction! Day of the Triffids! 

 

 

 

The theme of alien invaders is a trope that crops up time and again in science fiction. What would science fiction be without an alien or two? You would be limited to Back to the Future, The Terminator or some other time travel movie, or dystopian science fiction films like Blade Runner or Soylent Green or Logan's Run. None of which are even remotely bad films, but still, you would miss out on such classics as The Day the Earth Stood Still and Close Encounters of the Third Kind. If you were to list your own favorite science fiction movies, I would be willing to bet that at least 50% of them had some sort of alien beings in them.

In my own list of the top science fiction films of all time (according to my account on FlickChart) no less than 7 of the top 10 have some sort of alien coming into play over the course of the film. Only Escape from New York and RoboCop (a dytsopian future film) and The Final Countdown (a time travel movie) have no aliens present. (Terminator 2:Judgement Day, which comes in at #11, also has no aliens). It's safe to say that the science fiction world would probably not exist if aliens had not been a factor in the beginning.

So, if aliens are one of the most predominant factors in science fiction, it makes it important that at least some of the aliens have something different to make them stand out against the crowd. One of the more interesting alien invasions, based on a novel by Jack Finney, had the aliens come to earth as seed pods and gradually replace the human race with exact duplicates. The Body Snatchers has been done at least 4 times in film, first in 1956, with remakes of the same story in 1978, 1993 and most recently in 2007.

In a similar vein, John Wyndham wrote The Day of the Triffids. The triffids were a new species of plant that had come to Earth via a previous meteorite storm. They were animated later, through the after effects of a another meteor shower. Although I guess you couldn't put any intelligence into those spores, quite possibly it could be inferred that was an "alien invasion", since the spores do come from outer space. But then, who is to say both of those events weren't engineered by an advanced race trying to prepare the way for an invasion... something to think about. (That idea is just my own thoughts, the movie doesn't expose any nefarious plans...)

   

 

 

Day of the Triffids (1962):

The film begins as our narrator (voiced by Peter Dynely, whose voice you may recognize from the TV cartoon Thunderbirds) intones sonorously:

"In nature's scheme of things, there are certain plants which are carnivorous, or eating plants. The Venus Fly Trap is one of the best known of these plants. A fly drawn to the plant by its sweet syrup, brushes against triggered bristles. Just how these plants digest their pray has yet to be explained. There is much still to learn about these fascinating eating plants. This is a newcomer: Triffidus Celestus, brought to earth on the meteorite during the Day of the Triffids!"

 

There is a freak occurrence of a meteorite storm of unprecedented proportions coming to Earth. But no big deal, at this point, as our narrator tells us:

"All reports confirm that the world is witnessing an unprecedented shower of meteorites. There is no record of a display such as this in recorded history. At observatories astronomers are noting this fantastic phenomenon, and are carefully calculating the effect on our solar system. The consensus of option is that the meteorites burn up from the intense heat before they reach the Earth."

(BTW, if you have ever witnessed one of those meteorite storms that occasionally streak across the night sky you may conclude that this one HELL of a "freak occurrence". Those things are really coming in close...) 

Apparently the only person in the whole world who is not able to see the meteorite storm is Bill Masen (Howard Keel), who has had the unfortunate timing of having had to go through a recent eye surgery, and his eyes are currently bandaged up. And the killjoy of a doctor insists that he wait until the full 10 days required for waiting go by before removing the bandages, which won't happen for another 8 hours. (Killjoy!)

 

In a remote lighthouse we also have a pair of married marine biologists, Tom and Karen Goodwin (Kieron Moore and Janette Scott). These two are also unable to watch the meteor storm, not because their eyes are bandaged up, however. They're too busy working. Or at least Karen is. Tom seems more interested in getting drunk. 

 

The first indication of something strange happening is when a night watchman at the Botanical Gardens is attacked and killed. (Why does the botanical Gardens need a night watchman? Hell, I don't know... Except SOMEBODY has to be the first victim...)

 

The next morning, at the hospital, Masen wakes up to find out it is an hour later than when he was promised to have his bandages removed, with no one around. So he removes the bandages himself. What he finds is a hospital in shambles and apparently no one on the premises. But eventually he finds his doctor, who is now blind. It is revealed that everyone who had watched the meteorite storm has been inflicted with blindness. 

Not only that but there is a strange plant that has figured out how to become mobile, uprooting itself from the ground, moving about and attacking humans. A radio announcer tells anyone "if you are blind it is urged that you stay indoors..." (Thanks for the warning). Masen gets out of the hospital and wanders the streets of London where everyone he sees is walking around blind. 

 

 

He rescues a little girl, Susan (Janina Faye), apparently one of the few people that can actually still see. She was accosted by a disreputable character against her will, but given the fact that he is one of the many who are blind, it is apparent he only wanted her to help him (but he could have asked first...) Masen takes Susan with him to his ship, where he was an officer on board. But no one is there. But via the radio they find that chaos is in effect nearly everywhere.

 

 

Between the pair stranded on the lighthouse island and the pair motoring around London trying to find a place where some semblance of normality may still exist, the sighted people find not much hope. Those triffids are on the move. (And, I realize there is a whole mess of them around, but those things are pretty slow, so it doesn't seem like it would be all that hard to stay out of their reach, since they can see where they are...)

 

Eventually Masen and Susan come across some others who can see.  These are a couple and another person who had (coincidentally, or conveniently, depending on your perspective) collided with each other in a car wreck and were under sedation when the meteorite storm hit. Everyone who can still see had the same set of circumstances happen; they were otherwise unable to see the meteors, which is why most of the rest of the world is now blind.  (Question... weren't at least some people in bed asleep as part of their normal routine? Where are THOSE people?)

 

The survivors that Masen and Susan find are running a sort of refuge and have a contingent of blind people they are helping. But the threat of the triffids threatens to overwhelm them. These things are plants, after all, and in the way it is with all plant life, it has ways of regenerating itself. Eventually, some of the survivors think that safety is only by making it's way to a naval base. (Of course, in the tradition of everything threatening life in the free world, the military is THE answer...)

 

Spoiler Alert! If you want to watch this movie stop now and come back to it after watching it.

 

Ultimately, however, the answer is much simpler, as is discovered by our two refugees on the lighthouse island. The key to defeating the triffids turns out to be something which the Earth has a very high concentration. Salt water, or sea water.

 

"A simple method had been found to destroy the triffids. Sea water, from which life on Earth had sprung, became the means of preserving life on Earth. Mankind survived and once again have reason to give thanks." 

 

One of the more interesting tidbits I read is: the entire subplot sequences involving the marine biologist couple was sort of an afterthought. After getting the film ready, the production crew found that the running time of the finished movie would only last about an hour. They needed more. (Credit is due to Bill Cram at Screenage Wasteland for this tidbit. I found his review after I wrote most of this review, and I found it  quite interesting.)  The solution that comes to the biologists seems to alter whatever the trajectory the film would have had without them. Which makes me wonder... if it hadn't been for them would the film had had a happy ending? The novel did end a bit differently, with only a hope for triumph, rather than an actual triumph.

The Day of the Triffids suffers from the same unbelievability that the mobile rocks did in The Monolith Monsters, if you ask me. But like that other film, the story that surrounds it, as well as the lead actors playing their roles, make the whole thing tons better than you would expect. The film suffers quite a bit on special effects, although not really for the triffids; they look pretty effective and gruesome. The real problem is that a lot of the matte paintings look just like what they are, matte paintings. And a plane crash that occurs early in the movie looks entirely like what is is, a model plane crashing into miniature buildings.

The Day of the Triffids currently holds a 79% Fresh rating, and I am not sure how well it did at the box office. It had a budget of a little over $1 million, and probably most of that went to making the mobile plants look decent. Only Howard Duff was a big name in the feature. I didn't find any contemporary reviews, but one I found on Variety website said "A simple method had been found to destroy the Triffids. Sea water, from which life on Earth had sprung, became the means of preserving life on Earth. Mankind survived and once again have reason to give thanks." (They also had a comment that I liked: "Basically, this is a vegetarian’s version of The Birds..." I wonder whether any vegetarians would be so quick as to advocate a plant-based diet after watching this film...😆)  

While I don't think The Day of the Triffids holds up as well for someone who has seen many other creature features that followed in it's footsteps, I think it is a very effective film. 

Until next time, drive safely folks. And maybe forgo that short cut through the woods... Come back tomorrow for Coffy!

Quiggy