Showing posts with label 2000. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2000. Show all posts

Friday, March 20, 2026

The Boy Who Cried "Wolfe"

 

 


This is my entry in the 12th Annual Favourite TV Show Blogathon hosted by A Shroud of Thoughts

 


 

I love Sherlock Holmes, but second only to him is my love of Nero Wolfe. 

Nero Wolfe was the creation of one Rex Stout, whose first published Nero Wolfe story was Fer-de-Lance, published way back in 1934. It wasn't his first novel ever, however. He had about 9 novels under his belt before the introduction of his legacy character. But it is a sure bet that when you mention the name Rex Stout, the first thing that will come to mind of the average bibliophile will be "Oh, yeah! He wrote those Nero Wolfe stories!" 

Over the years after Wolfe appeared on the scene, there were numerous attempts to bring him into the audio and visual world. The first two attempts were in the realm of Hollywood films. Meet Nero Wolfe and The League of Frightened Men were films released in the late 30's. Then came several attempts to bring him into the home via radio programs (in the days when was radio did what TV does today).

In 1977, a pilot was created for TV, featuring Thayer David as the portly detective, but it was abandoned before it could get off the ground because David passed away shortly after it was filmed. However, a couple of years later, another attempt was made to create a TV show, this time with William Conrad as Wolfe, along with Lee Horsley as his legman, Archie Goodwin. Unfortunately that only aired for one season.

The detective was essentially on hiatus until 2000, when a producer managed to secure the rights to film another series. This series would end up lasting for two seasons and featured Maury Chaykin as Wolfe and Timothy Hutton as Archie. In my opinion this series was the best in it's portrayal of Wolfe, taking great pains to stick to the original source material. (Each episode was based on an actual story or novel written by Stout).

Both the Conrad and the Chaykin efforts got their start in their respective series with an adaptation of the Stout novel The Golden Spiders. This entry in the canon featured Wolfe out of his normal milieu, in that his "client" wasn't a rich person who could pay his exorbitant fees, but a young neighborhood boy for whom Wolfe gradually got involved because of his own sense of obligation. 

It is not a spoiler, since it is primary to the story, but in the novel the young boy is killed, and since Wolfe had served the boy some cookies and a coke at his dinner table it was an affront to his personal dedication to decorum to find the killer and bring him (or her) to justice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

First I want to tell the basic story as it appeared in print in The Golden Spiders novel by Rex Stout. I will later describe the similarities and any differences in each production. The Golden Spiders  was first published in 1953.

The story begins with Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin sitting down to dinner.  Fritz brings in the dish and Wolfe stops, distracted by the smell. He queries Fritz on the alteration of the recipe he was expecting, because Fritz had decided, on his own, to try to do it different from the normal way he had made it before. Wolfe decides to admonish Fritz and have it taken away, instead opting for some eggs and toast. But Archie throws a little gas on Wolfe's ire by saying he will sample the fare.

During this minor kerfuffle, there is a ringing of the doorbell. This further irks Wolfe, not only because he has not scheduled a meeting with anyone, but he has never conducted business during meals. When Archie goes to the door he finds, not the expected adult who would normally be the cause of intrusion, but a neighborhood kid, Pete Drossos.

Pete has a case for Wolfe. During his duties as a street window wiper he encountered a woman in a fancy car, wearing spider earrings. The woman mouthed a message to Pete; "Help! Get a cop!" but the male passenger made her drive off. Pete thinks there might be some kind of trouble and maybe a reward in it, since the car was a high end Cadillac and thus  meant she was probably rich, and wants to split it 50/50 with Wolfe if he will help.

Wolfe has Archie check out the car description, along with the license plate that Pete had jotted down. It turns out that the same car was described as having killed Matthew Birch, an agent with INS (the Immigration and. Naturalization Service). Initially Wolfe comes to the conclusion that Birch may have been the male passenger. 

The next day, the car is identified in the death of Pete on the street who had been going about his window wiping job. This in itself is an affront to Wolfe because the boy had been basically a guest in Wolfe's house.  The police, in the person of a police sergeant, comes to inquire about Wolfe's ad searching for the driver of the car that Pete saw the woman in, and informs Wolfe of the boy's death.  

Not long after they receive the news of Pete's death, his mother shows up and gives Wolfe his life savings, $4.30, and tells Wolfe that Pete's last request was that mom give the money to Wolfe and ask him to get the guy who ran him over. But Wolfe does not want to get involved, that is until a very obstinate Archie berates him and demands that he at least try to find the woman in the golden spider earrings.

Laura Fromm, a wealthy widow, shows up claiming to be said woman, but Wolfe determines she is lying. She eventually admits she was not the driver, but she thinks she knows who was. But she asks for a day to verify her suspicions. She leaves Wolfe a retainer, mostly to help her avoid being implicated in the crime. However, Laura also turns up dead, having been pushed out the window of her apartment. . There were several people at a party who were the last to see Laura alive, at a dinner party, prior to her death. Now Wolfe is strong in his conviction to get to the bottom of the crimes. And his main suspects are those people she was last seen with.

Among the people at the party were Jean Estey, Laura's secretary, Dennis Horan, an attorney who was there with his wife, and Angela Wright. All were involved in a charity that helped displaced persons (immigrants). Wolfe puts his regular associate detectives, Saul Panzer, Fred Durkin and Orrie Cather, on various angles to investigate, and Archie poses as himself, but as a less than scrupulous associate of his employer, in that he proposes to each of the suspects that he has information about the private meeting between Fromm and Wolfe that each would be interested in, but will only sell it at a price.

There are some subtle goings on in the meantime. Saul poses as an immigrant who needs help but is approached by a suspicious man who tries to blackmail him. Fred follows two hoodlums and ends up being exposed as an associate of Wolfe and is tortured. Archie and Orrie rescue Fred and take the two hoodlums back to Wolfe's place. Saul recognizes one of the hoodlums as the guy who tried to blackmail him and exposes him as a small time gambler "Lips" Egan. It turns out that Egan's lawyer is Horan, one of the friends last seen with Laura Fromm, but he is not so willing to own up to knowing who Egan is.

As typical in a Wolfe mystery, Wolfe invites all of the suspects to his office and with the presence of Inspector Cramer, exposes the culprit. It turns out that Fromm's secretary, Jean, was running a scam operation that blackmailed potential immigrants into paying money for a quick transition to citizenship. Fromm had discovered the scam, as had Birch, so that's why they were killed. Pete was just a kid in the wrong place at the wrong time, but he could have easily identified Jean as the woman driving the car, and maybe Birch as the passenger.    

Nero Wolfe  The Golden Spiders (air date Jan. 16, 1981):

Cast members:

Nero Wolfe: William Conrad
Archie Goodwin: Lee Horsley
Fritz Brenner (cook): George Voskovec
Inspector Cramer: Allan Miller
Saul Panzer: George Wyner
Pete Drossos: David Hollander
Mrs. Drossos (Pete's mom): Rhoda Gemignani
Laura Fromm: Penelope Windust 
Jean Etsey: Carlene Watkins
Angela Bell (subbing for Angela Wright from the novel): Katherine Justice
 

 

The 1981 version of the story diverges quite often from the original source novel. In the first place, Archie is not dining with Wolfe as he has a date, but after he plays his prank with Wolfe and Wolfe decides to call his bluff, he is forced to forgo the date and take notes.

The second thing is the boy is not killed. Chalk this one up to late 70's / early 80's sensibilities. You couldn't exactly have a kid die, even if it was after the family hour block of night time TV programming.

What stays the same is the appearance of Pete's mother who gives Wolfe the money Pete had (which, this being 1980 instead of 1953, is actually a bit more than the $4.30 from the novel),  and gives him the message that Pete asked Wolfe to find out who ran him over. And Laura Fromm does show up. And she is indeed exposed as a fraud.

Of course, it goes without saying, that any of the subplot involving attempts to remove Pete from the land of the living after the accident are not a part of the original novel, including a scene where a hit man from New York who had been hired by someone as yet unknown in the timeline of the story. The same hitman tried to take Archie out of the picture by wiring his car to explode. Needless to say, there was not hitman in the original novel.

Being that this novel had to be condensed to accommodate the 50 minute running time, there were several subplots that had to be left by the wayside. For one, most of the scenes involving the small time hoodlums were left by the curb. And those that were included had to leave out the characters of Fred Durkin and Orrie Cather. Saul Panzer filled in most of those other two roles in his own story line with the undercover operation he was conducting.

At least they didn't change the ultimate reveal of the criminal murderer. But one other point, one that might disturb people who insist on their favorite characters being consistent with the ones in print, is the fact that Nero Wolfe, who almost NEVER left the house, and when he did it was almost always in the company of his legman Archie, leaves to visit the boy in the hospital. Although we don't actually see him in the hospital, it is implied that he WAS there.

This particular episode, being ostensibly a translation to film of a bona fide story in the Nero Wolfe canon, is a little frustrating for someone, like me, who objects to changes in the story. The TV version only bears some resemblance to the original novel, and there are enough alterations that, while entertaining in it's own right, come off more like one of those older radio shows: i.e. based on the characters of Rex Stout's creation, but not entirely consistent. 

The series only lasted one season, and of the 14 episodes in the run, 6 of them were original stories (that is, not based on any specific story in the canon. Of the remaing 12 stories, all of them ostensibly based on Stout

Nero Wolfe The Golden Spiders (air date Mar. 5, 2000):

Cast members: 

Nero Wolfe: Maury Chaykin
Archie Goodwin: Timothy Hutton
Fritz Brenner (cook): Colin Fox
Inspector Cramer: Bill Smitrovich
Saul Panzer: Saul Rubinek
Pete Drossos: Robert Clark
Mrs. Drossos (Pete's mom): Nancy Beatty
Laura Fromm: Mimi Kuzyk
Jean Etsey: Larissa Laskin
Angela Wright: Nicky Guadagni
Orrie Cather: Trent McMullen
Fred Durkin: Fulvio Cecere
 
Being that there was a lot more time to develop the story (the running time of a typical episode of the series ran anywhere from an hour and a half to two hours), the episode based on The Golden Spiders could spend a lot more time fleshing out characters. Not only that,  but the producers were more faithful to the original source. Typically if any changes were made, they usually consisted of condensing the scenes to make them more manageable (as would be the case if they were filming a major story for theater release.)

The best part of this and some of the other episodes in the series was that they had decided at the outset to keep the episodes firmly entrenched in the 1940's. You won't see a cell phone or a computer, or for that matter, a car on the road that is not a 40's or earlier model. 

The stories that Rex Stout wrote ran from the 30's into the 70's, and although the other kept them more or less current with the times, they never aged. So in 1934, Archie was about 30 and Nero was about 50, and in 1975, Archie was about 30 and Nero was about 50. Same with the TV series. 

The interesting facts to pint out are: Since this was basically just a one-off  film with as yet no plans to develop a series, you may notice a few things. For one, the character of Saul Panzer was played by Saul Rubinek, but when the series moved forward, Rubinek was cast as Archie's newspaper contact, Lon Cohen, and the Panzer role was taken over by Conrad Dunn.

Most of the TV series actors, other than the ones playing main characters are not here. Did you know the TV series was basically run as a touring company type of show? Meaning many actors were recycled into various roles throughout the series, much like a traveling Shakespeare touring company, also referred to elsewhere as an "ensemble cast".

As stated earlier in this post, one of the things I admire about this episode is that the producers didn't shy away from pointing out that the young boy Pete Drossos was killed. Apparently 20 years since the 1981 TV show, they thought the audience could handle such a drastic event. To be honest, I really couldn't find ANY drastic changes to the script. Those few that did occur are so minimal that only a nit-picker could grouse about them.

As I stated in a previous blog entry on the overall series, The Big Bad Wolfe, this series is well worth checking out. 

Until next time, drive safely folks.

Quiggy


 

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Blood on the Rocks






This is my entry in the Gothic Horror Blogathon hosted by Pale Writer.






The original film vampire, predating Bela Lugosi by almost 10 years was the German expressionist version of the classic Stoker novel Dracula titled Nosferatu.

























Nosferatu (1922):

The classic first adaptation of Bram Stoker's classic novel Dracula had its problems from the start.  First, Murnau and company were unable to secure the rights to the original novel, so being the obsessive sort of people, they just went with the story, changing the names and locations, but not much else.  Which really pissed off Stoker's widow.  She had all the prints collected up and destroyed.  And thus we would have lost a timeless gem from the silent era.  Except that one or two of the copies were not destroyed.

In Wisborg, Thomas Hutter (Gustav von Wangenheim) is tasked by his boss, Herr Knock (Alexander Granach) with going to Transylvania to secure a deal with Count Orlok (Max Schreck) to buy a house in Wisborg (coincidentally an abandoned castle next door to Hutter). 





Upon arriving in Transylvania most of the residents try to discourage him from continuing on his mission.  They talk of werewolves and monsters, but Hutter dismisses the superstitions.

When he arrives at the Count's castle he is met by Orlok.  And despite several bizarre incidents, including the count trying to suck the blood from a cut on Hutter's finger, Hutter and Orlok are able to seal the deal.  Only after he has completed the deal does Hutter discover some truly bizarre behavior, including discovering Orlok's true nature as a vampire.






Back in Wisborg, the ship carrying Orlok and his coffins arrives.  Orlok has killed off the entire crew, but the authorities blame it on a plague.  There is a panic within the town as people are encouraged to stay inside to avoid contracting the "plague".  Of course, all of Orlok's victims in the town are attributed to this "plague" so no one but Hutter seems to be aware of the imminent danger of the new resident.

Hutter's wife, Ellen (Greta Schroder) discovers a book that Hutter has brought back with him and tries to use it to defeat the vampire.  The story takes a different turn here as, instead of Orlok escaping back to his home after being discovered, he sticks around.  Mainly because he is very intent on seducing Hutter's wife.  Which, of course, proves to be his undoing.



The classic film is now available in various forms, since it is in the public domain.  I highly suggest you look for some recording like Criterion to watch it, however.  Some companies take some liberties with the film.  The most egregious one, my first attempt to find a copy, is put out by November Fire Productions.  Avoid this one at all costs.  Not only do they cut down the film somewhat, but they add (egads) sound, with people actually speaking.  It is not, as the back of the package says "a great way to experience this vampire classic".






Shadow of the Vampire (2000):

Shadow of the Vampire takes a look at the production of the aforementioned Nosferatu.  In 1921 Friedrich (F.W.) Murnau (John Malkovich) endeavored to film what he considered to be his masterpiece, a film somewhat based on the Bram Stoker novel Dracula.  Although the film is entirely fictional, we get some insight into the time period, if not an accurate portrayal of the principal figures.





Murnau is wrapping up production in Berlin, and preparing to transfer everyone on site to film scenes in Czechoslovakia.  Waiting there for them is the actor that Murnau hired to be his vampire, Max Shreck (Willem Dafoe).  Shreck is described to the rest of the crew as what is surely on of the earliest incarnations of a "method actor".  Murnau tells his crew that Shreck will only appear in costume and must be addressed by his character name of "Count Orlok".





None of the crew has ever heard of the guy.  Murnau says he found him in the Russian theater company of Stanislavski ( a well known theater director of the time).  As with any production there are a few dissenters, especially from his producer, Albin Grau (Udo Kier) who objects to an unknown being cast in the title role.  He also gets some flak from his female star, Greta Schroeder (Catherine McCormack) who objects to being taken away from Berlin at the height of the theater season.





On location, the scene takes on some bizarre turns.  Wolfgang Muller (Ronan Vibert) starts to act more and more like he is suffering from exhaustion.  And Schreck/Orlok makes several attempts to actual complete his "transformation" to a vampire by trying to drink the blood of one of his co-stars.  Gradually it is revealed that Count Orlok is not really an actor but someone that Murnau found living in the castle already. (And, although unknown to the rest of the crew, Murnau knows that Orlok is really a vampire, and has lived for centuries in the castle.)

A battle of wills occurs as Orlok and Murnau fight over whether Orlok has any rights to make Murnau's production crew victims for his bloodlust.  Midways into the film a great exchange occurs between Orlok and Murnau over whom may or may not be indispensable to the production.  Murnau threatens Orlok, but Orlok is unimpressed, since he feels that after centuries he is almost indestructible.

The only thing that Murnau can hold over Orlok is his promise that Orlok can have Greta as one of his victims, but only if he, Orlok, plays along and behaves himself until the final scene.  But Orlok is his own man (vampire) and doesn't exactly conform completely.

Obviously the movie is fiction (since no sane person believes vampires exist).  The movie takes a few liberties while covering the history behind the story. Several of the crew die, when in fact  all of them went on to longer careers in film. The movie is entertaining on it's own merits.  The film was nominated for an Oscar for Best Makeup (losing to How the Grinch Stole Christmas).  And Willem Dafoe lost an Oscar nom for Best Supporting Actor to Benicio del Toro (in Traffic).  Roger Ebert named it as one of his "Best 10 Movies of 2000".

An anecdote that I thought was interesting.  The original title was going to be Burned to Light, but when Dafoe asked director Merhige "Who's Ed?, he changed it.  Dafoe supposedly thought the title was going to be Burn Ed to Light...  (The anecdote may be apocryphal.  I have trouble believing it.  But it's interesting nonetheless).

Time to head home.  Drive safely folks.  And don't pick up any hitchhikers with really long fingernails and ugly features.

Quiggy

Sunday, February 12, 2017

A Special Post to the Drive-In



I'm not the kind of person to shy away from controversy.  And while I've kept this blog rather light-hearted over the past year or so, I have come across two rather riveting documentaries I felt obliged to share.  Both deal with the homosexual community, one as the subject of Nazi Germany's persecution of its homosexuals in the late 30's and 40's, the other a look at the AIDS epidemic and how people in the homosexual community fought to have the government address it with the issue and find medical solutions to the epidemic.

























Paragraph 175 (2000)

From the beginning of the film:

"An unnatural sex act committed between persons of the male sex or by humans with animals is punishable by imprisonment; the loss of civil rights may also be imposed.

Paragraph 175
German Penal Code, 1871"

Well, there it is in black and white.  As early as 1871 homosexuality was deemed a crime under German law.  But the same or similar codes existed throughout the world, in some form or another  (and still exist in some countries, to be sure).  You can even find history of some of the more liberal minded nations, including the United States and England having laws against "sodomy".   The Nazis being who they were and the essence of the theme of purity of the Aryan race, however,  caused the group to enact harsher penalties than any that the rest of the "civilized" world may have done, but it was not wholly limited to the Nazis.  The documentary follows Klaus Muller, a young man who interviews five surviving homosexuals and one lesbian, all who experienced the persecution of Nazis, as well as their life and experiences prior to the rise of the Nazis .  Rupert Everett was tagged to be the narrator of the film.

In the Weimer Republic, paragraph 175 was largely ignored, although crackdowns did occur.  In Berlin, the decadent lifestyle of post WWI, however, included allowing homosexuals to exist freely, for the most part. "Heinz F." (a psuedonym)  tells of a club in Berlin which allowed itself to be rented out a couple of times a week for dances for homosexuals.  Annette Eick, a lesbian tells of falling in love with a woman at one of these gatherings that reminded her of Marlene Dietrich.  This woman made it to England and sent Annette a passport that got her out of Berlin.

Pierre Seel, a Frenchman is somewhat reluctant to talk to Klaus because of his experiences.  He says he made a promise to himself at the time that he would never talk to or shake hands with a German. Albrecht Becker  had an older lover that he spent time with for 10 years during the Wemer Republic.  Gad Beck tells of an athletic trainer with whom he had an encounter.  All of the interviewees tell of how the years before the rise of the Nazis were almost idyllic.

Upon the rise of Hitler, however, that all changed.  It was not immediate however.  Even Hitler's right hand man, Ernst Rohm, the founder of the SAS, (the Stormtroopers) was gay.  Hitler himself condoned Rohm's sexuality, at first, claiming that since  the SA was "not an institution for moral education...but a formation of seasoned fighters...private life [could] not be an object of scrutiny", thus basically saying it didn't matter about Rohm's private affairs so long as he didn't conflict with the ideology of the Nazi party.

That changed almost immediately however, and with the so called "Night of the Long Knives" Rohm and many of his followers were executed and then it was open season on German homosexuals.   it had been preceded by the same treatment with Jews.  Many in the gay community thought they were safe however, because they considered themselves to be loyal Germans, but soon found out that didn't matter.

The film continues with interviews with the former concentration camp survivors, Heinz Dormer, Karl Gorath, as well as the previously referenced "Heinz F.", Pieere Seel, Albrecht Becker and Gad Beck.  Some of the film is rather heartbreaking, much as interviews with surviving Jews who were persecuted by the Nazis are.  Typically, according to the fim, it was the homosexual males who received most of the attention.  A passage of the narration states that the Nazis thought the lesbians could be rehabilitated.  Most of this prejudice stemmed from the fact that the Reich needed every available fertile female to increase the population of the Aryan nation, not because they actually had any plan to implement for the rehabilitation.

Paragraph 175 will make you think.  It is obviously not the film for family night (or maybe it is, if your children are old enough to understand what they are seeing).



How to Survive a Plague (2012)

The title of this movie (probably) gets its genesis from an outburst from Larry Kramer midways through the film, in which he addresses a group of AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) activists:  "Plague! We are in the middle of a f***ing plague! 40 million infected people is a f***ing plague! "

The film covers the efforts of ACT UP to get the government and the drug companies to fulfill their obligations to find a cure for the disease of AIDS.  Most of the people involved in the actions were from the homosexual community, but they had several medical personnel who also worked to find the cure.  But they had some very serious opposition, especially in the person of Jesse Helms, a U.S. senator whose own view is on record that the homosexual community brought this epidemic on themselves through their own actions, including, but not necessarily solely, having bad safety measures during sexual intercourse.

The activists, which included men like Mark Harrington, Bob Rafsky and Jim Eigo formed a group to spur the drive to find a cure.  Because of the prevailing views of political representatives kept the drive stalled, and because the drug companies seeking a cure were hampered by rules and regulations that inhibited quick solutions, the activists had to take to protests at various locations to try to bring public awareness to the situation.

Coupled with all this political agenda, we as viewers are also let into some of the private lives of some of the people who either had been infected or wee affected by the loss of loved ones who had been infected by the disease.  Also along the way, a splinter group called Treatment Action Group (TAG) formed to take a different tack in getting the cure in motion.

The film ends on a positive note as there was some success in using a variety of drugs that prolonged the lives of the victims of the disease.  Although some of the main figures did pass on from the disease before the success, we find several of the main figures (I assume) in present day still surviving the "plague".  The film will open your eyes and may even instill some faith in human nature.  I admit that I found some of the actions by the ACT UP group to be a little disturbing, but that is tempered by the fact that some of the politicians don't seem to be quite the sympathetic souls they should be.  (Jesse Helms, of course, but even Bill Clinton in archival footage doesn't come off all that sympathetic).

As a heterosexual male, I still got a lot from both of these films.  I recommend both, but as with the first one, they are not family-friendly films, so exercise caution if you want to watch them with children.